The “cure” God told Moses to construct for the people who were bitten by poisonous snakes was to construct a brass serpent and place it on a pole for the people to look at. One thing to realize is that it took a lot of time for Moses to construct such a brass serpent on a pole. Their salvation from when the solution was announced to when it was implemented took time. It was not immediate.

Moses first had to make the mold: craftsman would be needed to make it look like a snake that could drape over a pole or cross. The brass had to be collected and melted. Once poured, it had to be allowed to cool. While brass was commonly used and the Israelites had obtained much of it from the Egyptians and it could be melted using wood fires, the making of such an elaborate piece would likely have taken several days to a week or more in order to complete the process. How many people died before the brass serpent was on the pole for them to look at?

This is somewhat congruent to the time it took for Jesus’s birth to occur here on the Earth. A lot of time passed from when God first announced Christ’s coming to earth (Gn 3:15) to the time he arrived (Lk 2:11). God says Christ arrived at just the right time. He did not come too late, and he did not come too early. Galatians 4:4-5 says, “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship.”

So why did Jesus arrive on the Earth when he did? Let’s explore that question. Well, the short answer is only God knows! Yet, there are a few reasons we could mention that could help to explain this:

1.      The Law was needed for mankind to understand they could not save themselves by following a set of rules.

2.      The people were ready for a Messiah (although most were looking for the wrong type of Messiah).

3.      The entire known world was under the domain of Rome and Parthia with both existing in a détente where travel was allowed between the two empires enabling travel over the known world to be allowed with little resistance.

4.      Jews lived in almost all prominent cities of the known world.

So, it seems Jesus arrived on the scene when he was supposed to arrive—not any earlier; not any later. There is a video by Julian Gentry (MK TriciaUGC FB 240318A 16x9 to MK VSL Alt Intro 16x9 1 07x (youtube.com) who gives an explanation as to why Jesus had to have come 2000 years ago and not at any other time in history. Julian is a Christian who works for Ratio Christi in North Carolina ministering to college studies. He also makes YouTube videos of apologetics in defense of the Christian faith. In this video referenced here, he makes two main points: first, this was the time of history that many cultures were looking and worshipping a type of god with many of them having similar characteristics and this was the time that Jesus Christ stepped into history and made a lasting impact which has lasted for over two-thousand years. Second, if Jesus Christ had been just another “god,” then his influence should have waned just like all the other ones did. But he didn’t. He is still impacting people in a positive light even today.

That fact is something we can’t really ignore. I hope you don’t either.

Next time, we’ll look at how Nehushtan is, indeed, a mysterious paradox.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Have you ever tried to convince someone of a fact you knew to be true, but they just would not accept what you said and kept making excuses as to why it could not be as you told them? Perhaps someone famous is in town and you want your friend to go with you to meet them, but they keep insisting that person is not here and continually tells you why that person could not be who you claim him/her to be. They never get to experience the joy of meeting that special someone with you that you had hoped for. Well, Jesus had the same problem when he was here on the Earth.

Awhile back, we discussed there were three miracles Christ performed which proved himself to be the promised Messiah that Old Testament prophets had predicted would one day come (Jesus Drives out an Evil Spirit): healing a person blind from birth, healing a Jewish leper, and healing a mute who was demon possessed. Yet, Jesus did all three of these things (Jn 9:1-6; Mk 1:40-44, Lk 5:12-14; Mt 9:32-35), yet the Jewish leaders still did not believe Jesus to be their Messiah. To give these Jewish leaders the benefit of the doubt, two of these were brought to them by hearsay so they had to believe the witnesses to be credible. Yet, one of these would involve a temple priest and he would, or should, have to at least question Jesus’ validity of being their Messiah. What do I mean by saying this?

Moses gave the cleansing rituals for what one who had been cleansed from leprosy (i.e., some type of a skin disease) was to do (Lv 14:1-7; 33-53). When the temple was constructed, four chambers within the four corners of the Court of Women were built: Nazarite Chamber, Chamber of Wood, Chamber of Oils, and Chamber of Lepers. Those who were cured from leprosy would take their required offerings to the priest on the eighth day of their purification ritual, immerse in the mikveh within the Chamber of Lepers and then go to the Nikanor Gate (the gate between the Court of Women and the Inner Court) where a priest would pronounce him or her clean and be anointed with the blood from the sacrifices provided earlier.

This is all well and good, but it seems that there was never a recording of any Jew being healed from leprosy since the time of Moses. Therefore, it became a saying that only the coming Messiah would be able to heal a Jewish leper. So, shouldn’t the priest that day have been totally shocked that this man was coming to receive a pronouncement of being cleansed after having been a leper? There should have been a big stir among all the temple priests that day. After all, something that had not happened in several centuries had just occurred. Wasn’t that worth a stir?

So why didn’t it? I guess we will never know for sure, but we can speculate. The Jewish leaders had already had some falling out moments with Jesus. Rather than praising them for their meticulous keeping of all the tedious commands the Law required, Jesus criticized them because they did not really care about the people (Lk 11:42). They cared about keeping the letter of the Law, but not the overarching theme of how the Law should lead the people to God. They used it to brag and show how the “common” people were not as good as they were in keeping the Law. Because of this, Jesus reprimanded them. Jesus’ harsh words hurt their pride and angered them. According to them, if Jesus was the Messiah who was proclaimed by all the prophets, he should care about the Law and be raising them up as pristine examples of how to keep the Law, and invite them into his kingdom he was to now set up. Therefore, it is my suspicion that when the once-leper told the priest it was Jesus of Nazareth who healed him from his leprosy, this priest likely totally dismissed what the man said and likely didn’t even accept that the man had leprosy in the first place or was cured by happenstance somehow. Or, as was done on other occasions, just told the man to be grateful he had somehow been healed and give glory to God because the man Jesus was no Messiah.

So, the Jewish leaders really had no excuse in not knowing that Jesus Christ was their Messiah. He had fulfilled all their teachings about what a coming Messiah would do. What he did not do while he was with them was set up an earthly kingdom and they used this fact to justify their unbelief (Jn 10:22-42). If they had asked questions, they would have come to learn that Jesus first had to overcome their spiritual needs before he could overcome their physical needs.

So, what was the outcome of their unbelief? They missed out on one of the greatest blessings that could have been theirs. And they kept other Israelites from enjoying that same blessing. Their whole life, they had taught about a Messiah who was prophesied to come to Israel and believed a Messiah would come but missed it completely when he finally did arrive—mainly because of two things. First, Jesus did not meet their expectation of what a Messiah would look like, do, and accomplish. Second, they let their pride and hurt feelings get in the way of them objectively looking at what Jesus said and did. They asked no questions. They just condemned.

Today, the Christian community has become polarized, and we seem to be on the verge of the same problem that these Jewish leaders had. We think we know the next steps God is going to take on this Earth. Some adamantly say the time of the Rapture is upon us (1Th 4:16-18). The world is so bad, there is nothing else that can save us expect Christ coming for his bride. Others say that the Holy Spirit is going to sweep across the Earth like a flood (Hk 2:14) and will achieve the greatest harvest since the Church was founded back in the book of Acts. Many are quite adamant in this regard as well. Each side has scripture to back them up. So, who is right? The Jewish leaders had Scripture to back up why they did not accept Jesus as their Messiah, not realizing that their reservation of doing so was really about what the Messiah would do at another time in history. Their minds and hearts were not open for God to instruct about this so he could use them in their day and time.

So, what is the solution? Let God be God. Prepare for the possibility of either scenario to occur. Plus, neither of these events may happen or occur exactly as we think they will. These New Testament Jewish leaders certainly thought they had it all figured out. After all, they had been studying their Scriptures their entire lives. They couldn’t conceive God coming any other way except how they envisioned it in their minds. Yet, they totally missed it. They let tradition override God’s actual plan. Let’s not be the same way.

Could the Rapture be upon us? Certainly. Yet, could God also send the Holy Spirit to cleanse his bride to make her purer and bring in a harvest of souls to expand the number to be part of his bride? Certainly, and it would be within his character to do so.

No matter which scenario God performs will still be awesome. Let’s be open to the leading of the Holy Spirit during this time. Let’s not be so adamant about our future that we don’t allow God to use us in what he has prescribed for our time. Let’s press into his Word and press into Him so we can have an open heart and open mind focused on Him. Then, we can be part of something amazing that God is going to do. We are definitely on the cusp of something. Something wonderful. Let’s be sure we’re ready. God bless.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The narrative about the event of Jesus riding into Jerusalem on the colt of a donkey to fulfill prophecy was controlled by none other than Jesus Christ himself. He was the one who orchestrated all of this. Why did he? And was it to only fulfill prophecy?

While prophecy fulfillment is an important reason, I think there are additional important reasons as well. He was forcing the Jewish leaders to a final decision. Jesus had tried to get the Jewish leaders to understand that his miracles were evidence of him being their Messiah, just as Isaiah prophesied: “Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute tongue shout for joy. Water will gush forth in the wilderness and streams in the desert” (Is 35:5-6).

Isaiah spoke of a future time when sickness would be no more, and people would live a long time. Jesus’ miracles confirmed that he could cure the sick and keep people form dying. The Jewish leaders had to decide if they were going to overcome their pride and accept Jesus for who he claimed to be.

Jesus wasn’t against the Jewish leaders, even though he spoke harshly to them. He just wanted them to be who they claimed to be. After all he told the people, “So you must be careful to do everything they [i.e., teachers of the Law and the Pharisees] tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach” (Mt 23:3).

Jesus now enacted a prophecy all Jews, and especially the Jewish leaders, would be extremely familiar with. The question was, were they now going to accept Jesus as the fulfillment of that prophecy as the people were currently doing?

As mentioned previously, Jesus likely entered the Sheep Gate with many of the pilgrims who had come to Jerusalem for the Passover with their lambs as he was presenting himself as the paschal lamb they had been waiting for since the time of Moses. This was the 10th of Nisan, the time that lambs for Passover were set aside and evaluated before offered and verified fit for Passover sacrifice (Ex 12:3-7).

The Jewish leaders wanted Jesus to stop the people from praising him for two important reasons, or at least important to these Jewish leaders: (1) This Hallel psalm the crowd was quoting from was about the Messiah, which they did not believe Jesus to be, and (2) This Hallel psalm was the one they quoted when they took the paschal lamb to the temple for sacrifice; so, according to them, this was not the right time for the psalm to be quoted. They, as always, looked at the prophecy without considering how and when it would be fulfilled.

Both of these reasons indicated Jesus was the Messiah and the people’s national paschal lamb. The Jewish leaders asked Jesus to stop the people from quoting from this Hallel psalm, but Jesus replied that if they stopped, the very stones would take up their cry. Jesus being the Messiah was not just for the people but for the Earth as well. Paul tells us in Romans, “We know that the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time” (Ro 8:22). The Earth itself is also waiting for the reign of the King of kings.

There is another important reason Jesus rode into Jerusalem. He was also fulfilling Zechariah’s prophecy. We’ll get into that reason next time. I hope you join me.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This is perhaps the only “negative” miracle of Jesus recorded in Scripture. This is found in two of the gospels: Matthew chapter 21, verses 12-27; and Mark chapter 11, verses 1-33.

To understand this miracle, we need to understand what occurred prior to this miracle. Jesus had ridden into Jerusalem on the colt of a donkey. Why is that? This fulfilled a prophecy of Jesus doing so which we find in Zechariah chapter 9, verse 9.

What were the people saying about Jesus as he entered the city? “Hosanna to the Son of David,” “Hosanna!” “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” “Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!’ “Hosanna in the highest heaven!”

They were quoting from Psalm 118: “LORD, save us! LORD, grant us success! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD. From the house of the LORD we bless you. The LORD is God, and he has made his light shine on us. With boughs in hand, join in the festal procession up to the horns of the altar. You are my God, and I will praise you; you are my God, and I will exalt you. Give thanks to the LORD, for he is good; his love endures forever” (Ps 118:25-29).

Today, we use the word Hosanna synonymous with Praise. Yet, in Hebrew, the word Hosanna means “save, rescue, savior.” The people were saying and acting out this passage in Psalm 118. They were saying they recognized Jesus as the fulfillment of this scripture and their Messiah to bring in his kingdom for Israel.

So, why did Jesus get angry with the tree and why did he drive out moneychangers?

Fig trees give two fruits: small nodules in Spring on the new shoots just as the leaves are coming in and then figs in the Fall, around September near Rosh HaShanna on the shoots from the previous year.

Here, with the leaves already on the tree, there should have been nodules where the leaves attached to the stem, but there was nothing. So, something was wrong with this tree and would not yield a fig harvest.

Jesus saw this representing what he saw at the temple. The Jewish leaders looked good, but they were pushing out converts, i.e., Gentiles whose only place to worship was the Court of Gentiles.

The temple was designed with separate spaces which takes one closer and closer to God. The high priest could enter the Holy of Holies once a year where he was to meet with God. Priests could enter the Holy Place which contained specific furniture representing the traits of their coming Messiah and make the sacrifices on the bronze altar outside the temple. Levites could only enter the Court of Priests and aid in preparing the animals for sacrifice. Jewish men could only enter up to the Court of Israel, a space just outside the Court of Priests going all the way around the temple itself. Jewish women could only enter the Court of Women which was a large area on the other side of the Nicanor gate and the steps where the Levites would play musical instruments and sing. This was the area which had large lights which were utilized during certain feasts. Gentiles could only be in the Court of Gentiles which was outside from where any Jew could enter. There was a balustrade beyond which no Gentile could go or be met with sudden death from temple guards.

The Court of Gentiles became packed during festivals. This is where all the vendors set up for sacrifices and money changers sat. According to the historian Josephus, during a Passover week, up to 250,000 lambs would be sacrificed.

Why did Jesus overturn the tables here? This was the only place where Gentiles could worship. They were kept from worshipping due to all the chaos and selling of animals. Their place of worship had been turned into a chaotic marketplace.

Gentiles were some of the most responsive to Jesus. His kingdom was open to both Jews and Gentiles. Here, Gentiles were being excluded.

As Jesus and his disciples returned from the temple, the disciples now noticed the fig tree had withered and they were amazed. This fig tree represented the leaders of Israel, as Scripture refers to Israel as a fig tree, and most notably the Jewish leaders:

“I will take away their harvest, declares the Lord. There will be no grapes on the vine. There will be no figs on the tree, and their leaves will wither. What I have given them will be taken from them” (Jr 8:13).

Jesus fulfills this scripture. Religious leaders were in the way of the coming kingdom. They thought and acted like God’s salvation was exclusive to them because they followed the Law. Jesus said they look good on the outside, just like the fig tree, but they were not producing fruit. Something was wrong on the inside of them.

Jesus reacted to their myopic view of scripture where they over-interpret some parts but then ignore others. They were ignoring their responsibility to being God’s light to the world.

God had told Abraham his descendants were to affect the whole world: “I will make you into a great nation, and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all people on earth will be blessed through you” (Gn 12:2-3).

God had told Israel they were to be God’s priests to the entire world: “you will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation” (Ex 19:6).

God had revealed through the prophet Isaiah that Israel was God’s servant to show God’s glory: “He said to me, ‘You are my servant, Israel, in whom I will display my splendor’” (Is 49:3).

Why did Jesus not explain this to the Jewish leaders? He tested their hearts to see if they would listen. They refused, so he did not go further with them. They closed off the community. They focused on their own worship and on each other, never looking outward. This led them to cause all their people to lose the greatest blessing Jesus was offering them.

Are we not like these Jewish leaders today? Today, have we become dead fig trees? As a church, have we become so focused on ourselves that we have forgotten the Great Commission? Jesus is giving the opportunity to be transformed. Others see us and should want to worship God as well because of how they see him working in us.

How did the Jewish leaders miss that Jesus was their promised, long-awaited, Messiah? The word Messiah comes from the Hebrew word Mashiach; in Greek, Christos, and means “anointed.”

Hebrew: Yeshua HaMashiach : Jesus the Messiah; Jesus the Anointed One

Greek: Jesus Christ: Jesus the Messiah; Jesus the Anointed One

In the books of the Law, Messiah is noted as a priest:

“Then the anointed priest shall take some of the bull’s blood and carry it into the tent of meeting” (Lv 4:5).

The word “anointed” is mashiach, from which we get the word messiah. In the Historical Books and Psalms, Messiah is noted as a king:

“David asked him, ‘Why weren’t you afraid to lift your hand to destroy the Lord’s anointed?’” (2Sa 1:14).

“These are the last words of David: ‘The inspired utterance of David son of Jesse, the utterance of the man exalted by the Most High, the man anointed by the God of Jacob, the hero of Israel’s songs’” (2Sa 23:1).

“There I will make the horn of David to bud. I have ordained a lamp for my anointed” (Ps 132:17).

Again, the word “anointed” is mashiach, i.e., messiah.

The prophets were anointed by the Holy Spirit:

“The Lord was with Samuel as he grew up, and he let none of Samuel’s words fall to the ground. And all Israel from Dan to Beersheba recognized that Samuel was attested as a prophet of the Lord” (1Sa 3:19-20).

“Samuel said to them, ‘The Lord is witness against you, and also his anointed is witness this day, that you have not found anything in my hand’” (1Sa 12:5).

This is where the idea that the Messiah will be prophet, priest, and king originates. He came as a prophet (Holy Spirit descended upon him; Jn 1:32), he is currently our High Priest making intercession for us (Hb 8:1-2), and will come back and rule as king (Rv 11:15).

Daniel then paints the Messiah as the Conquering One:

“In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence. He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and people of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed” (Da 7:13-14).

“Know and understand this: From the time the world goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. After the sixty-two ‘sevens’, the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood. War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him” (Da 9: 25-27).

This led to the teaching of two coming messiahs: one who would come, suffer, and die and then one who would come to conquer.

What was the Messiah expected to do?

“The desert and the parched land will be glad; the wilderness will rejoice and blossom. Like the crocus, it will burst into bloom; it will rejoice greatly and shout for joy. The glory of Lebanon will be given to it, the splendor of Carmel and Sharon; they will see the glory of the Lord, the splendor of our God. Strengthen the feeble hands, steady the knees that give way; say to those with fearful hearts, ‘Be strong, do not fear; your God will come, he will come with vengeance; with divine retribution he will come to save you.’ Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute tongue shout for joy. Water will gush forth in the wilderness and streams in the desert. The burning sand will become a pool, the thirsty ground bubbling springs. In the haunts where jackals once lay, grass and reeds and papyrus will grow. And a highway will be there; it will be called the Way of Holiness; it will be for those who walk on that Way. The unclean will not journey on it; wicked fools will not go about on it. No lion will be there, nor any ravenous beast; they will not be found there. But only the redeemed will walk there, and those the Lord has rescued will return. They will enter Zion with singing; everlasting joy will crown their heads. Gladness and joy will overtake them, and sorrow and sighing will flee away” (Is 35:1-10).

“But your dead will live, Lord; their bodies will rise—let those who dwell in the dust wake up and shout for joy—your dew is like the dew of the morning; the earth will give birth to her dead” (Is 26:19).

“In that day the deaf will hear the words of the scroll, and out of gloom and darkness the eyes of the blind will see” (Is 19:18).

“The Spirit of the Sovereign Lord is on me, because the Lord has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim freedom for the captives and release from darkness for the prisoners, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor and the day of vengeance of our God, to comfort all who mourn, and provide for those who grieve in Zion—to bestow on them a crown of beauty instead of ashes, the oil of joy instead of mourning, and a garment of praise instead of a spirit of despair. They will be called oaks of righteousness, a planting of the Lord for the display of his splendor” (Is 63:1-3).

According to the Torah, the Messiah will be a male descendant of the Jewish King David, human - he will have a human birth and human parents, a perfect teacher of God’s law, a great political leader - inspirational and a good judge, able to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem, ruler over humanity - but he will rule with kindness, the bringer of peace to the world, and able to unite humanity. Ultimately, it is believed that the Messiah will establish God’s kingdom on Earth.

The Jewish leaders were focusing so much on the conquering aspects of their Messiah they ignored all his other attributes. They focused on what they wanted from God and did not ask what God wanted from them.

May we not do the same.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

We find this miracle recorded in three of the gospels: Matthew chapter 9, verses 20-22; Mark chapter 5, verses 25-34; and Luke chapter 8, verses 42-48.

The woman with the bleeding issue likely had menorrhagia. This is a heavy menstrual flow that is typically defined with these types of symptoms: (1) soaks through one or more sanitary pads or tampons every hour for several consecutive hours (realize this woman had nothing like these products to help, but likely used rags or strips of cloth); (2) heavy bleeding that requires a person to use more than one period product at a time (she would not have had this aid); (3) the need to change pads or tampons in the middle of the night (she would have to continuously wash the strips of cloth she had and continuously reuse them); (4) menstrual flow or bleeding lasting more than a week (hers had lasted for at least 12 years –can you even imagine?!); (5) the passage of blood clots that are the size of a quarter or larger; (6) symptoms of anemia, including fatigue and shortness of breath (how she could maintain a living would be quite difficult); (7) constant lower abdominal and pelvic pain (for her to ensure for so long is a testimony to her fortitude); (8) the inability to perform regular daily activities because of bleeding (this would force her to be labeled unclean).

These symptoms from which she suffered had a huge social stigma for her to bear. She would be considered perpetually unclean requiring her to separate herself from family and all of society, could never go to the temple or synagogue, and likely had to live alone without any physical human contact.

The cause of menorrhagia could be from any number of issues: hormonal imbalance, ovaries that are dysfunctional, fibroids in the uterus, polyps, adenomyosis, cervical cancer, bleeding disorders that are inherited, progesterone hormone deficiency, anovulatory cycles in the first year of attaining menarche. These are difficult issues to deal with in today’s society. It is hard to imagine the hardships she had to go through.

We know very little about her background. At one time she had money, or her family had money as she had seen many physicians to try and get healed. So, at one time, people cared for her. Perhaps over time that dwindled away and she became a social outcast. Was she bitter? Did she still have people who cared? We can only hope she had family who still cared for her. Yet, even if so, there would be no human contact since she would be considered unclean constantly.

How did the woman decide that she would only touch the hem (tzitzit) of his garment? In these passages, the Greek word is krsaspedon, meaning fringe, tassel, border, or hem. The Hebrew word is tzitzit. In Numbers chapter 15 and in Deuteronomy chapter 22, it instructs that tassels, or tzitzit, should be placed on the corners of their garments.

Tzitzit were prepared in a very specific way. Five double knots were placed on each tzitzit tassel. In the spaces between these knots, one of the fringes being longer than the others is coiled around the rest. Seven coils in the first space, eight in the second, eleven in the third, and thirteen in the fourth for a total of 39 coils and has the same numerical value as “HaShem Echad”: God is One.

One could ask, was the woman justified to disobey the Law to get to Jesus? In her mind this was her one and only shot to get cured. If she wasn’t cured, then she may have people angry at her for making them ceremonially unclean, but she likely had that occur so many times before. If she was cured, then she could have a normal life. Some argue that as long as her skin did not touch anyone else’s skin, then no one would become unclean. Yet, in a crowd of this size, such a condition could not be guaranteed.

Was Jesus made impure because the woman touched his clothing? The Law stated this about a sin offering: “Whatever touches any of the flesh [of the sin offering] will become holy, and if any of the blood is spattered on a garment, you must wash it in the sanctuary area” (Lv 6:27). Since Jesus was our sin offering, one could argue that he was in no danger to become unclean, but he would be the one to pass cleansing on to the woman rather than she passing uncleanness onto him. In addition, by her touching the tzitzit of Jesus’ garment, there was no danger of making him unclean, even if the previous argument is rejected.

Although many people were touching and jostling Jesus, he knew immediately when this woman touched his tzitzit. Healing went out of him into her. Others wanted what Jesus could give them but did not possess the faith in what Jesus could really give them. This woman had the faith in what Jesus could do for her. What was Jesus’ response? He called her daughter. Can you imagine what an emotional impact that had on her? He did not condemn her for disobeying the Law of Moses by putting others at risk of becoming unclean but had tender compassion for her and praised her for her faith. She got far more from Jesus than what she had ever dreamed of receiving.

What about you? What do you want from him? He only requires faith to achieve something for you that will also be beyond your comprehension: a new life that will transform you forever. How special is that?

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

There are actually two storms recorded in scripture which Jesus calmed. Yet, there is only one of these storms Jesus rebuked, and only one was involved with Jesus’ walking on the water.

One of the miracles of Jesus calming a storm is found in three of the gospels: Matthew chapter 8, verses 23-27; Mark chapter 4, verses 35-41; and Luke chapter 8, verses 22-25.

This is on the heels of Jesus’ sermon on the mount, which likely lasted for days—about a week. He did not have to physically feed people at this time because there were towns on the northwestern portion of the Sea of Galilee near Mount Eremos. Capernaum was less than 2 miles away. And Gennesaret was about the same distance in the opposite direction.

When Jesus got into the boat, he went to sleep almost immediately. He was likely exhausted, and his body needed rest. The storm did not even wake him. The disciple, on the other hand, were quite concerned for their lives and woke Jesus. It is odd that they woke him but then acted surprised when he calmed the storm. After all, what were they expecting him to do if not calm the storm?

We need to ask, “Who was Christ speaking to when he said, ‘Quiet! Be still!’” The word for “quiet” here means “silence” or “hush.” The word for “be still” here means “to muzzle.” This would imply this storm was caused by Satan and Jesus was rebuking him and his actions. Satan had to immediately comply because he cannot go against a direct command.

There is another instance recorded in Scripture about an instance when Jesus walks on water and calms a storm. This instance is found in three gospels: Matthew chapter 14, verses 22-33; Mark chapter 6, verses 45-52; and John chapter 6, verses 16-24.

This incidence came on the heels of Jesus feeding the 5,000 men as well as women and children by multiplying five small loaves of bread and two fish into enough food to feed such a crowd and then even have leftovers! After this event, Jesus went to be alone and pray as the disciples left in a boat to head back to the western side of the Sea of Galilee.

When the storm came up, the disciples saw Jesus walking on the water and at first thought he was a spirit, but Jesus assured them who he was. Peter asked to come to him. Jesus agreed. Peter started walking on the water as well, but he got distracted and began to sink. Jesus helped him up and they both got into the boat and the storm immediately calmed.

This time, there was no rebuking of the storm. The storm calmed the moment Jesus stepped into the boat. Perhaps, as we just stated, the first storm was from Satan trying to cast doubt on their faith whereas this storm was an opportunity for them to exercise their faith.

Is there a reason for only Matthew to include Peter walking on the water? Matthew was an eyewitness of the event. Mark got his information from Peter who likely did not want to detract from the miracle of Jesus walking on the water. John was selective in the miracles he presented in showing Jesus as divine.

It seems the feeding of the 5,000 put all the people into a frenzy. Everyone started going all around the lake trying to find Jesus for more food or for healing. It seems Jesus’ teachings were not the main reason people followed him.

What about us? Are we searching for Jesus for what we want him to do for us? Or are we willing to be content and praise him for who he is? Perhaps we, like Jesus’ disciples, all need some self-reflection.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle is found in the following passages: Matthew chapter 8, verses 28-34; Mark chapter 5, verses 1-20; and Luke chapter 8, verses 26-39.

It’s almost funny, but I’m sure Jesus’ disciples did not think so. Jesus had decided to go to the other side of the Sea of Galilee. His disciples likely thought he was wanting to get to a solitary place away from the crowds for awhile as the other side of the sea was composed mostly of Gentiles rather than Jews and certain areas were rather barren and, thereby, a good place to “get away.” However, things did not go according to plan. On their way, a sudden storm came up and nearly capsized their boat. Jesus, being with them, calmed the storm and allowed them to arrive safely.

So, here they were, tired and dazed from the ordeal only to now be met with two disheveled, deranged, naked men run toward them and yelling at the top of their lungs. I’m sure their eyes were as wide as saucers. I know mine would have been!

These men were madmen. They were not in their right mind, were naked, had cuts all over them, had broken chains around their ankles and wrists, and were yelling at the top of their lungs, had long, mangled hair and long beards for no one could get close to them to help them. Trying to help was risking one’s own life. These men were uncontrollable.

They also had severe personality changes. We know this became the before and after pictures painted in these passages show them to be quite opposite to each other. When possessed, the men would strip off their clothes, yell, cut themselves, and be violent to others. Afterward, they were calm, clothed, and in their right mind.

One of the two stated his name was Legion. A legion of soldiers was typically 6,000 men. It is unclear if this was the name of just one of them or both together. Either way, they each were possessed with more than one demon. Those who have witnessed demon possession tell us that each demon has its own distinct personality and that the individual possessed begins to manifest the distinct personality of the demon by which he is possessed. If it is a feminine spirit, the voice will be a feminine one, if masculine then very manly.

They had anti-social behavior. They lived in solitude away from civilization and that is likely why they lived in the tombs as this would be a place not many would ever visit. They were also hostile to others. No one wanted anything to do with these men.

These two had keen spiritual insight beyond what most humans had for they instantly recognized Jesus and knew him as the Son of God or Son of the Most High. Even many humans did not identify Jesus in this manner. They asked if Jesus had come to torture them before their time. So, these demons who possessed these men knew their ultimate fate.

The demons also gave these men super-human strength. When caught and captured, they would break their chains and then go to solitary places. Hence, this is why they were around the tombs and away from civilization, which fit the characterization of them being anti-social.

These poor men were in a constant state of mental torment. They would shriek like wild animals and act insane. Likely their cutting of themselves with stones may have been partly to try and stop their mental pain using physical pain, or these demons caused these men to hurt themselves just for their own delight and show their control over these poor men. The mental torment by these demons must have been unbearable. No wonder everyone was afraid of these men.

These two possessed men seemed to totally ignore the disciples with Jesus as they directly approached Jesus himself. This was not an act of worship but an affront for him coming into their territory. Their acknowledgement of Jesus was done in a state of yelling and screaming.

It seems this was not a simple exorcism as had been in other instances. These men bowed before Jesus, but they were not worshipping him. It seems Jesus had told them to leave, and this is when they went into a fit for Jesus not to torture them and send them away. In Jewish thinking, demons were assigned to specific geographic areas, so they also asked that they might not be asked to leave the region. There are other scriptural passages that do seem to support this idea. Luke’s account adds that they asked not to be sent to the Abyss where others had been sent previously (2Pt 2:4).

Perhaps these demons were so afraid of Jesus sending them away to the Abyss they proposed an alternative. They knew Jesus would not allow them to enter another human, so they proposed to go into the herd of pigs: 2,000 of them. Of course, this would mean that each pig would be possessed by more than one demon.

Jesus granted their request. Why did the pigs then run headlong off a cliff and into the sea and drown.

1.           As the men, when possessed, were not in their right mind, these pigs were now not in their right mind either.

2.           Each pig had more than one demon inside them which likely caused much confusion.

3.           Pigs can swim, so they normally would not have died just because they jumped into the water. Yet, likely, because demons cause those they possess to harm themselves, this may have been part of that, or the pig became so distraught that it panicked and thereby was not able to think clearly enough to swim.

4.           Jesus likely used this as a topical lesion for those in this area as well as for his disciples as well:

a.           Jews considered pigs unclean, so it would seem natural for an unclean spirit to enter unclean things, or animal in this instance

b.           The Sadducees taught there were no such thing as a spirit, but this scenario totally demonstrated that spirits were absolutely real. While one could argue that the men were just insane (due to chemical imbalance of neurotransmitters), their state after encountering Jesus argues against that supposition because the men became calm while the pigs acted irrationally. Seeing such would have been truly revealing that these spirits were real.

c.           These Gentiles used pigs not only for food but for animal sacrifice to their “gods.” They would not have believed their gods were evil but were their protectors. This demonstrated that whom they served was not looking out for their best because the demons just took away part of their main livelihood.

d.           This forced these Gentiles to decide if their livelihood and their beliefs were more important than the lives and restoration of two of their citizens.

The response of the townsfolk is quite telling. Those who tended the pigs first ran back to town to tell them what happened to the pigs. When the people came to investigate, they then saw the men now completely sane and clothed. Seeing the men like this for some reason made these townsfolk afraid. So apparently this indicated Jesus was even more powerful than these two men had been. Perhaps the townsfolk couldn’t process that fact. To them, a demon-possessed man who had super-human strength should have had the upper hand. Perhaps these two men became demon possessed due to some of their religious rites and rituals.

These townsfolk had rather have a demon-possessed man in their town than Jesus, the one who had rid these men from their spiritual torment. When people are more afraid of what Jesus will do in their lives than what Satan does in the moment, they often push Jesus away.

At least one of these men not only wanted to go with Jesus, but to be with Jesus. Jesus told the man to go back to his townsfolk and tell all he met about what Jesus had done for him. This was just the opposite of what he told many Jews when they were healed.

In Galilee and Judea there were Messianic hopes which would have been quickly fanned into flames if the miracles of Jesus were too widely publicized too quickly. There was no such danger in the Decapolis, Greek cities on the eastern side of the Jordan, and thus the mercy of the Lord was to be heralded. This is exactly what this man did. He obeyed Jesus.

Spurgeon said of this passage: “He was told to publish what great things the Lord had done for him. He went and published what great things Jesus had done for him. Did he make any mistake? Oh, no! It is but another name for the same Person: for Jesus is the Lord; and when you speak of him as divine, and talk of him in terms fit only for God, you do but speak rightly; for so he deserveth to be praised.”

This passage should help us understand the reality of the influence of Satan in our culture. Our main warfare is not of flesh and blood but of a spiritual realm (Ep 6:12). The occult is real and can entrap people today just as it did to these two poor men. In the beginning we may think we are in control but like these two men showed, ultimately, they will become our master.

This also helps us to see the counterpart to demon possession is the filling (or control) of the Holy Spirit in our lives (Ep 5:18). Yet, contrary to demons wanting to torture us, the Holy Spirt wants to impart new life to us, help us become more godly, and have us exhibit the character of God in our lives. As the control of these demons were evident in these men, we should strive to have others see the control of the Holy Spirit in our lives. Which control do you desire? Only one yields true freedom.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Three examples of such a miracle are given in scripture: (1) a person who had just died only minutes before (Mt 9:18-19, 23-26; Mk 5:21-24; 35-43; Lk 8:40-42; 49-56); (2) a person who had been dead for a day or so (Jn 7:11-17); (3) a person who had been dead for over three days (Jn 11:1-57). Think about this as we go through these examples.

Jairus was a ruler in the synagogue at Capernaum. The ruler of the synagogue was the man chosen to care for the physical arrangements of the synagogue services. Today’s equivalent would be the president of the synagogue. They partner with the clergy, oversee the business operations of the synagogue, preside over the governance of the congregation, and serve as the chief financial officer and revenue generator.

This man’s daughter was likely only dead for less than an hour or so because she was sick when Jairus left to get Jesus and had just died when Jesus arrived at his house.

Surely, Jesus knew that the girl had actually died, so why did Jesus say Jairus’ daughter was only asleep? We don’t know for sure. Maybe he was indicating that weeping and mourning for someone who had hope was not necessary. Maybe he was indicating that there is no true death when the Messiah is involved, or her time of death will be so short it will be as if she had been asleep. Maybe he was mocking them for they were insincere in their crying and weeping.

It seems strange, and almost rude, that the mourners laughed at Jesus’ statement. Why did the mourners laugh? These were likely professional mourners. In rabbinic times, funeral processions were led by lamenting female mourners, often professionals. The Mishnah states that "even the poorest in Israel should hire not less than two flutes and one wailing woman" for his wife's funeral. Women also composed elegies that were chanted aloud. Prohibitions against women's voices being heard in public were relaxed for funerary rituals. Therefore, these mourners had no real invested interest in the family. This was just a job to them. Otherwise, they would have been incensed at his statement and not have resorted to laughter.

Why did Jesus tell Jairus and his family not to tell anyone what happened? Maybe he did not want his fame to spread within Israel too quickly as that would overshadow his greater message. Yet, we must realize that keeping such an act silent in such a close-knit group of people would have been nearly impossible.

Why did Jesus only have Peter, James, and John with him when he healed the girl? We don’t know for sure because Scripture doesn’t tell us. Maybe, though, he knew these three would be the leaders of the church after his ascension.

Another example was the raising of a widow’s son. This man was likely dead only a day or so because a body was typically buried as quickly as possible after death because the Jews did not embalm their dead. We don’t know of any necessary reason Jesus would have to go through Nain on his journey from Capernaum. Undoubtedly, he went there to meet this poor widow and decrease her pain. Even if that was not the case, learning she was a widow and no other male sons, this moved him to have compassion on the woman.

She had no husband and now, no son. Typically, the property would go to the next male heir in line. Therefore, she would be dependent upon more distant relatives who may have less of her interest at heart. While during this time, some women did have affluence, this was not typically true of those of agrarian societies with less Roman influence. Even if she was able to own the property, she would not be able to take care of it on her own. And if she sold it, she would have no place to stay. So it was a conundrum. It seems Jesus had a solution to her conundrum that no one would have ever thought possible. Only he could turn sorrow into profound joy.

Next is the resurrection of Lazarus, a close friend of Jesus. Why was Jesus away when his close friend died?

It seems Jesus often stayed with Lazarus, Martha, and Mary in Bethany when he came to Jerusalem because the distance between the two cities was only about two miles. He had been teaching in Jerusalem and had several disputes with the Jewish leaders. Discussion became so hot they threatened to stone him. He eventually left to go on the other side of Jordan so things could settle down somewhat. Likely, he considered two miles not far enough away for him to be confronted outside Jerusalem.

So, an important question: did Jesus let Lazarus die? Bethany beyond Jordan (also known as Bethabara) was only 15-20 miles away from the Bethany near Jerusalem where Lazarus lived with Martha and Mary, and this distance could be traveled in a day. If it took the men a day to travel and tell Jesus of Lazarus being sick, and then Jesus waiting two days, and then traveling a day to reach Bethany where Martha and Mary were, then it would mean Lazarus died shortly after the men left on their way to tell Jesus. Lazarus was likely buried on the same day of his death as the Jews did not embalm people, and this occurred in the Springtime when decay would start to settle in quickly. Jesus knew Lazarus was dead as soon as the men told him he was sick.

If Jesus knew this, why did he tarry two days before starting his trip to Bethany and arrive on the fourth day after Lazarus died? Jewish mysticism teaches that a deceased person’s spirit remains around the body for up to three days after death before departing. It was well-known in Israel 2,000 years ago that someone deceased could come back to life during this 3-day period but not afterwards.

The other two examples were within this time period. Jesus wanted to show that he was indeed the Lord of Resurrection. After the spirit left the body and even after decay had set in, he could restore one to perfect health.

How much faith did Mary and Martha have? More than some, but less than likely Jesus expected. They didn’t doubt he was the Messiah and could heal. They were just unsure why he did not do it for their brother who was so close to him. Yet, they obeyed his command even though they did not understand it. That is the definition of faith, is it not?

Again, the Jewish leaders’ hearts were only hardened against Jesus for this feat which was clear only someone from God could accomplish. What was Caiaphas, the high priest, really saying when he said the following to his fellow members of the Sanhedrin: “You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish?”

Caiaphas was a Sadducee and held the position of high priest for 18 years. Sadducees held the majority seat in the Sanhedrin, the Jewish high court, over which Caiaphas ruled while he served as high priest. In terms of theology, Sadducees denied the afterlife and any existence of the spiritual world (angels, demons, etc.). Because of these things, they were often at odds with Jesus due to His teachings about humility, heaven, and his own deity.

In addition to his role as high priest, Caiaphas came under the direct authority of the Roman governor (he served under two: Quirinus and Gratus). The governor wielded power to appoint a high priest of his choice. This is why Annas worked hard to keep the high priesthood within his family after he was removed from that position. Caiaphas was his son-in-law. The governor could also use self-serving political influence and take custody of the high priest’s sacred vestments.

Caiaphas therefore had an incentive to keep the Pax Romana, the Roman peace, and help squash any and all insurrections of any kind. He was saying they had to have Jesus killed so that Rome would not take vengeance on them or the people as a whole. Therefore, that is why they plotted to have him arrested. His words, while intending to be their plot became the prophecy of why Jesus actually came to earth so he could die and unite all unto himself.

And what of your reaction? Will you be like Martha and Mary who had enough faith to follow Jesus’ instructions even when they did not understand them only to have joy beyond their imagination, or will you be like Caiaphas who saw only a means to and end in using Christ rather than acknowledging and serving him? He’s waiting for your response. Trust me; go for the joy.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

As we mentioned in a previous post, there were three types of miracles the Jewish leaders taught that only the Messiah would be able to do: (1) cast out a mute demon, (2) heal a man born blind, and (3) heal leprosy. We have already seen how he did the first two. In this post, we’ll see how he did the third.

The healing and cleansing from leprosy is found in three of the gospels: Matthew chapter 8, verses 1-4; Mark chapter 1, verses 40-45, and Luke chapter 5, verses 12-16. In these passages, Jesus encounters a man with leprosy who asked Jesus to heal him. Jesus does and tells the man to go to the priest so he could be pronounced clean and then enter back into society.

Then, Luke records another encounter for us in chapter 17, verses 11-19. Here there are ten lepers. They do not approach Jesus, but yell to him from a distance asking for healing. They head to the priest and are healed along the way. One of them returns and falls at Jesus’ feet praising and thanking him.

What about the healing of leprosy was considered so profound? In the Torah, it appears that God alone inflicts leprosy on a person:

“Then the LORD said, ‘Put your hand inside your cloak.’ So Moses put his hand into his cloak, and when he took it out, the skin was leprous—it had become as white as snow” (Ex 4:6).

“The LORD replied to Moses, ‘If her father had spit in her face, would she not have been in disgrace for seven days? Confine her outside the camp for seven days; after that she can be brought back.’ So Miriam was confined outside the camp for seven days, and the people did not move on till she was brought back” (Nu 12:14-15).

“They confronted King Uzziah and said, ‘It is not right for you, Uzziah, to burn incense to the LORD. That is for the priests, the descendants of Aaron, who have been consecrated to burn incense. Leave the sanctuary, for you have been unfaithful; and you will not be honored by the LORD God.’ Uzziah, who had a censer in his hand ready to burn incense, became angry. While he was raging at the priests in their presence before the incense altar in the LORD’s temple, leprosy broke out on his forehead. When Azariah the chief priest and all the other priests looked at him, they saw that he had leprosy on his forehead, so they hurried him out. Indeed, he himself was eager to leave, because the LORD had afflicted him. King Uzziah had leprosy until the day he died. He lived in a separate house—leprous, and banned from the temple of the LORD. Jotham his son had charge of the palace and governed the people of the land” (2Ch 28:18-21).

And in the Tanakh, it stated that no person had ever healed an Israelite from leprosy; only God himself had sone so. Because of this, the priest to whom these men presented themselves must have been taken aback to hear their stories of healing by Jesus as it was his belief that only God could heal leprosy. Unfortunately, we don’t have a record of his reaction.

Jesus was the only person who would touch an unclean person and not be afraid of becoming defiled himself. Why? One reason could be because of what the Law said about the sin offering.

“Whatever touches any of the flesh [of the sin offering] will become holy, and if any of the blood is spattered on a garment, you must wash it in the sanctuary area.” (Lv 6:27).

Did you catch that? As far as I know, this is the only thing that makes something else holy. Normally, the Law stated that anything unclean would make something it touches unclean. Here, it is just the opposite. That is why they had to be so careful about handling the sin offering. As Jesus was our sin offering, it seems what he touched became clean. In this instance, the leprosy (being an uncleanness of the skin) became whole (cleanness of skin). I find that remarkable.

There are some translations which state Jesus was “indignant”? The NIV is one of the few who translates the word to “indignant” rather than “having compassion.” There has been much debate about this. However, Jesus did have compassion or else he would not have healed. Yet, it may be that he could have become indignant because the man said, “if you will” which implied doubt on the man’s part that Jesus was willing. Jesus responded that of course he was willing and healed the man from his leprosy. If he was indignant, this did not mean he was not also compassionate. Otherwise, the man would not have been healed.

Leprosy was a very devastating disease. It wasn’t just the physical part where a person’s skin literally came off a person. It was that no one would touch a leper. Can you image going for years and years without any human contact or touch. For Jesus to touch him when he was a leper was probably more moving than we can ever imagine.

Why did Jesus give the healed leper a strong warning not to tell anyone except the priest? There are perhaps three important reasons to consider:

1)           Publicity over his healing might hinder Christ’s mission and divert public attention from his message to them. Such publicity is what, at times, forced Jesus away from the more populated areas.

2)           It was important that the priest pronounce the man to have obtained a genuine cure so that there might be no prejudice among the Jews against its being a real miracle. Possibly, if the man did not go at once to the priest without delay, evil-minded men might prejudice the priest and prevent his declaring the healing to be true because it was done by Jesus.

3)           Jesus did not want people focusing on the miracles themselves, but rather on the message he was proclaiming and the death he was going to die.

Why did the one leper come back to Jesus and the others did not? There are likely several reasons, but for this man who was a Samaritan, he had no priest to go to in order to show he was healed. The only place to go to have recognition of his cleansing was the one who had performed the cleansing. It is likely the others were Jewish and would go to the temple to receive their cleansing and be allowed back into society.

This does not excuse them from not returning to be thankful but could be one explanation for why this one man returned: not only because he was thankful, but he had no other person to present himself to for recognition of his cleansing.

So, we have seen Jesus perform three miracles that Jewish tradition stated that only their coming Messiah would be able to do. Yet, the Jewish leaders still did not believe him to be the Messiah. Why? Perhaps we should reverse that question and ask why do we not believe when we have this same level of evidence?

Ponder that and see if you can come to the same realization of who Jesus really is that his man did. What did he do? He threw himself at Jesus’ feet and thanked him. Jesus is waiting for this moment from you so he can wrap you in his arms just as you are. He is the sin offering. His touch will cleanse you. Are you ready?

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle is found in the gospel of John chapter 9, verses 1-41. Jesus and his disciples come across a man who had been blind since birth. His disciples are curious to know if this man or his parents had sinned causing this man to be born this way. Jesus said the answer was neither. This surprised the disciples because they had always been taught that such an incurable infirmity must be due to sin. They had often heard their Jewish leaders say, “there is no death without sin and there is no suffering without iniquity.” Some teachers of the law taught that Scripture taught this. For the parents to be at fault, some Jewish leaders pointed to Exodus 20:5 (for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me) and Ezekiel 18:20 (the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them). Yet, these phrases seem to be taken somewhat out of context to support this tenant. Regarding the unborn having sin, some rabbis thought it possible, while others thought it impossible. It’s not clear how widely held the prenatal sin view was, but apparently it was widely held enough to generate debate among themselves. Some argued that when it was stated about Jacob and Esau that they “struggled together” in the womb (Gn 25:33), it was implying they were trying to kill each other. Again, this seems to be an over interpretation of what the scripture is actually implying. So, it seems the disciples were wanting to understand from Jesus what the true answer to this debate was as they knew Jesus, of all people, would know the answer.

Instead, Jesus said this man was born this way so God could be magnified. Jesus made some mud using his own saliva, placed it on the man’s eyes, and then told him to go and wash his eyes in the pool of Siloam (in the southern part of the city of Jerusalem). The man did so and received his sight.

Jesus also made somewhat of a strange statement: night is coming when no one can work. What did he mean by this? The disciples were learning that they needed to make the most of their opportunities while they had the Light of the World (i.e., Jesus) with them. They needed to pay attention to him, to learn from him, so they could know him and faithfully represent him later. Today, we can’t “work while it is day” in the same way because Jesus is not personally here on earth. Yet, we still have been enlightened by him—he is the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6). Like the disciples, we should look to him, and like the disciples were encouraged to do—and like Jesus did—we should also make the most of the opportunities afforded to us. Each opportunity is provided by God for his glory, so we need to consider how we can work while it is still day.

Why did Jesus make mud with his saliva? There was a belief that saliva had healing properties. Maybe Jesus was indicating that healing was in progress to the people around him. Or it may be because the act of creating mud was considered work by the Jewish leaders. Perhaps Jesus is again emphasizing that the Sabbath was created for man and not man for the Sabbath (Mk 2:27). Doing good is always appropriate for the Sabbath. If the Law allowed them to get a donkey out of the ditch on the Sabbath (Dt 22:4), why not their fellow man who is far more valuable?

Why did Jesus send the man to the Siloam pool? In some respects, it was a word play, for the word Siloam meant “sent” (Jn 9:7). Christ had been sent by God through his authority, and now Christ was sending this man in his authority.

This was the last great day of the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot). The previous seven days, the priests each morning went from the temple to the Pool of Siloam in the southern part of the City of David and gathered water in a golden vessel and brought it to the altar through the Water Gate in the Southern side of the Temple. The water was then poured down the side of the altar to signify the outpouring of the Holy Spirit.

On this last day, the ceremony was not done. Yet, Jesus is now sending the blind man to the pool. Rather than the Holy Spirit being brought to the temple, the man is sent to the Holy Spirit for his healing.

Christ had just stated he is working while he is here on Earth. Who would be working when he is gone? The Holy Spirit. Perhaps this was a lesson for the disciples to ponder once he was gone from them.

Jesus did not go with the man to the pool. Who took him? We don’t really know. Maybe he knew his way around, but that’s traveling about a fifth of a mile. Also, Jesus was not there when the man received his sight. The miracle of sight would be its own witness for the man to proclaim to the people.

Why did the people not believe this was the man who had been blind and begged? Those who knew this man knew he had been born blind. They had been taught that one born blind could not be cured. Such a one was in sin and God would not heal such a man steeped in sin before he was even born. This is also why the Pharisees and Jewish leaders grilled him and his parents so. They also could not rectify that one born blind could now see. Rather than rejoicing in the miracle, they did all they could to deny the miracle.

They questioned the man relentlessly but did not believe him. They then questioned his parents and then brought the man back again. Not to understand, but how to discredit. They still tried to make the man feel like a sinner rather than rejoice with him. They said that the man who healed him was a sinner as well. The man quotes back to them scripture that they should know and reveals what they said about Jesus was untrue: “The Lord is far from the wicked, but He hears the prayer of the righteous” (Pr 15:29). This makes the Jewish leaders mad, and they tell this man that someone steeped in sin from birth has no right to tell the righteous (indicating themselves) they are wrong. They then forcibly excommunicate the man from the temple.

Jesus then meets the man a second time. This miracle affected this man deeply and he was willing to stand up to the Jewish leaders and point out their hypocrisy. He was ready for a true encounter with the Messiah. Jesus reveals himself and the man readily accepts him and worships him. Jesus does not stop him from doing so.

What did Jesus mean when he said, “For judgment I have come into this world, so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind?” The reference to those who see versus those who are blind is meant to explain this entire incident with the blind beggar and the religious critics. Those who admit their need, and trust in God, are those who will be granted sight—just as the blind man was given both sight and knowledge by Jesus in response to his sincere faith. Those who are arrogant and presume they already know, will be hardened by the presence of Jesus, instead. Despite their knowledge (“You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refused to come to me to have life” (Jn 5:39-40)), they allow their own prejudice to blind them (“The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2Co 4:4)), making them incapable of understanding what they don't want to understand, anyway (“Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own” (Jn 7:17).).

Jesus' statement here underscores an important principle: God holds people accountable not only for what they know but holds them absolutely accountable for it. Those who come to God in humility, admitting weakness and seeking truth, are met with grace and forgiveness. We see this in this man’s response to his encounter with Jesus:

When Jesus heard that the Jewish leaders had thrown the man out of the temple (i.e., excommunicated him), he found him, and said to him, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?” “Who is he, sir?” the man asked. “Tell me so that I may believe in him.” Jesus said, “You have now seen him; in fact, he is the one speaking with you.” Then the man said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him (Jn 9:35-38).

This is a good example of the fulfillment of Matthew 7:7–8 – “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.”

Those who think they are wise, who claim to have spiritual sight, will be judged accordingly (“Not many of you should become teachers, my fellow believers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly” (Ja 3:1)). This is especially true of those who, like the Pharisees, have knowledge and deliberately choose to ignore it.

Yet, can we today be too quick to judge here? Do we not at times act hypocritical? I think this is a good example for us to really look at our actions and see how they really align with Scripture. “If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn’t do it, it is sin for them” (Ja 4:17). Truth is necessary even when it is sometimes hard to hear.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Over the last several posts, we have been talking about four strange verses of hope. In case you missed the beginning of this series of posts, you can access it here: Strange Verses of Hope. We then mentioned that Adam rebelled in the Garden and lost out by inadvertently turning his kingdom over to the Adversary, Satan. Despite this, God gave Adam’s descendants hope. Today, I want us to look at this hope.

So, what then was their hope?

The Sacrifices and the Law were given for the hope of what was to come. I know that may sound the opposite of hope because the sacrifices were burdensome and the Law restrictive. But God is not about convenience, but of truth. Let’s look at the five types of sacrifices:

1. Burnt Offerings (Lv 1) – dedication of oneself to God

2. Grain Offering (Lv 2) – offering one’s best to God and recognize God as sustainer

3. Fellowship Offering (Lv 3) – God wants a relationship with his people

4. Sin Offering (Lv 4) – Atonement for one’s sin against God

5. Guilt Offering (Lv 5) – Atonement for one’s sins against one’s fellow man

These had to be repeated continuously and thereby pointed to the One who was to come who would fulfill them all. How do we know they recognized these offerings as the need for one to come?

We find this verse in the Gospel of John: The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (Jn 1:29). Not only John, but many Jews understood the purpose of the sacrifices and their prophetic meaning. The nation and the people had been waiting for this moment. John the Baptist was announcing that their wait was over!

Not only the people, but the Jewish leaders were waiting as well. But if they were waiting, then why did they reject Jesus as their coming Messiah? For one, he did not fit their preconceived idea of their coming Messiah. They believe their messiah could come and free them from all oppression, especially Roman oppression, set up a kingdom, and make Israel the pinnacle of kingdoms on this earth. But instead of doing this, Jesus criticized the Pharisees and Sadducees for their teachings which were leading Israel astray from the intension and purpose of the Law God had given. Rather than asking questions to clarify, they dug deep into their resistance. Sometimes, it is easier to believe in something knowing it will not come true in your lifetime. When it is fulfilled in your lifetime, you may have to make changes and realize that the way God is working is not how you thought he would work. These Jewish leaders fell into this trap. Unfortunately, they were not willing so realize God may be working differently than they had thought.

Now, let’s concentrate on what John meant when he said, “Lamb of God.” It means Christ became the ultimate sacrifice for their atonement. We need to understand the Hebrew and Greek words for atonement and what these words meant:

Old Testament: kipur (to cover)—This means the sacrifices did not take away their sin but just covered their sin for a time until they could be dealt with properly. They were taken out of view, but not taken away. These sacrifices and duties of the priests were symbolic of how their sins would be taken away sometime in the future, but these activities did not do that for them then and was the reason they had to be repeatedly performed.

As an example, I can give an incident from my childhood. Growing up, I hated green peas. While I love them now, I certainly did not then. One evening at dinner, my mother insisted that I had to finish eating my peas before I could get up from the dining table. Such a conundrum. What do I do? Well, it so happened that we also had mash potatoes that evening as well. I’m not sure why I didn’t eat all of them, as I loved mash potatoes, but it proved fortuitous for me that evening. I decided I would hide my peas under the mash potatoes. When my mother wasn’t looking, I would push a few peas under the potatoes. I couldn’t do them all at once, right? Can’t afford a suspicious mother. LOL. Well, when they were all under the mash potatoes, Mother let me get up from the table. Now, I had not complied with my mother’s demand, but they were no longer visible and thereby I was allowed to get up from the table. Now, I’m sure she discovered them when she cleaned the plate. But that is how kipur worked. The sins were just hidden but not taken away.

Now, sometimes, my father would eat my peas. This took care of the situation completely. They were not on my plate. They were gone. Not that I took care of them myself, but the problem was taken care of by my father. This is similar to the word used for atonement in the New Testament.

New Testament: katallage (to reconcile)

The writer of Hebrews gives us more information about this: He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all by his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption (Hb 9:12, NIV). And by that will, we have been made holy through the sacrifice of the body of Jesus Christ once for all (Hb 10:10, NIV).

As my father did for me, Jesus did for all of us. His actions solved the sin debt for us—not just hiding the problem, but reconciling the problem—making it no longer a problem at all.

But do we fully understand this sacrifice Christ made for us?

This is what I would like for us to explore further next time. It may amaze you to know the extent and length Jesus did for us so that we don’t have to face the judgment and consequence of our sin debt. It was truly not an act of cover up, but an act of reconciliation for which we should all be entirely grateful.

Come join me next time. Until then. God bless.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Of all the remarkable things in the book of Ezekiel, probably the term “Prince” has to be one of the more interesting and controversial. Let’s take a look at this.

Who is this Prince? Some have stated it is referring to the Messiah, Jesus Christ, himself. Others say it is the Old Testament King David now serving as the Messiah’s, the King of kings’, viceroy. Others have proposed someone else entirely. So, why the confusion? For one, these passages of scripture are not very specific. Secondly, we expect certain things based upon what other scriptures tell us, and we try to make it all fit. But, should we? I think if we take a step back, we can put some of the clues given in Ezekiel with these other passages of scripture about God’s promises to David and formulate a scenario which makes it all fit seamlessly without having to put a round peg in a square hole, so to speak.

I think it is fairly easy to eliminate the first assertion above, that this Prince could be Jesus Christ. After all, if Jesus is the King of kings and has his throne in the Holy of Holies, and is the object of everyone’s worship, then this could not be Jesus Christ, the Messiah, the King of kings. After all, this Prince is the one leading everyone in worship of the King of kings (Ek 45:17, 22). Therefore, it would make sense it would be someone different from him.

What about this Prince being King David? I think the confusion for this comes in because of the passage in Ezekiel which states, “I the Lord will be their God, and my servant David will be prince among them. I the Lord have spoken” (Ek 34:24). I think the term “prince” in this passage is showing the hierarchy in David’s relationship with God, the ultimate ruler. He will be of authority, but not ultimate authority. In addition, although subtle, there is no definite article with the use of this term “prince.” Therefore, I think this gives additional credence that this is a term of hierarchy than position. In addition, the Prince will be mortal and have children (Ek 46:16-17). David will be part of the first resurrection, have a glorified body, and will not marry and have children (Mt 22:30).

David, will, however, also be a king and rule over Israel (Ek 27:24). If Jesus Christ is to be the King of kings during this time, this would imply there will be many kings and Jesus will be the King over all other kings (Rv 19:16). There will be many nations during Christ’s kingdom (Is 62:2; Zc 14:16; Rv 20:3). So, just as there will be other kings over other territories, David will be the king over Israel during this time (Ek 37:24).

So, if Christ is the King of kings, and David is one of the many kings who will reign under the direction of Christ in his Kingdom, who is this Prince? From passages in Ezekiel, it suggests that this Prince will lead the people of the world in the worship of the Messiah, the King of kings, Jesus Christ. He will offer sacrifice for himself and for the people (Ek 45:22), he will be able to have children (Ek 46:17-18), and he will receive an inheritance of land like the tribes of Israel (Ek 45:7.18). From these passages, we gather this Prince is an Israelite and is mortal, as he will not have a glorified body. That would mean he had to come out of the Tribulation as a believer. This would give him a unique perspective for the people as he would understand the horrors of the world prior to Christ establishing his Kingdom, understand the importance of the people’s need to accept their King as the hope for their future, and will understand the importance of the sacrifices and what they mean for the people, and be able to teach them these things.

Because he came out of the Tribulation as a mortal, it would mean God had this plan for this one before Christ’s Kingdom was ever set up. That would at least suggest this one may have been one of the 144,000 prophets (Rv 7:4) who evangelize the world during the Tribulation as their lives would be protected (Rv 7:2-4) and would be assured to survive into the Promised Kingdom. This is not a guarantee of this, but, I think, is suggestive. Therefore, it would be plausible this one who becomes the Prince is from the tribe of Judah, where Jerusalem is located, and is one of these prophets the Lord raises up to evangelize the world before his return.

So, here is the hierarchy: Christ sets up his Promised Kingdom and reigns as the King of kings in Jerusalem. David reigns in his glorified state as the king of Israel during this time, just as other glorified ones will reign as king of other nations at this time. The Prince, non-glorified, will also live in Jerusalem, as he is an Israelite who will lead the people of the world in the worship of the King of kings and help the people of the world realize that Christ is not only their King, but also their Savior and their future hope for eternal life. While one-thousand years is a long time, it is still finite. Those born during this time must still chose Christ as their Savior and their hope, just as we do today, and this Prince will be instrumental in helping them see this need for their eternal future.

It’s interesting that God always seems to manifest and work in a triune manner. He is Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), the city of Jerusalem becomes three sections during his Kingdom (Rv 16:19), and the spiritual authority is also triune: Christ, the King of kings is the object of worship, David is the king of Israel, the nation leading the other nations in the worship of Christ, and the Prince is the one who can identify with the mortals of this time and lead them in the specific worship of Christ, their King, and their Messiah.

What about you? Are you going to be around to be part of all of this and witness it first-hand? Do you want to? Then take a note from Ezekiel and yield to this One who is now and forever the King of kings, the Messiah, and the Hope of your eternal future.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens