On the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur, Lv 16:1-34), the high priest, after making atonement for himself and his family, would take two goats to make atonement for the people. Lots were cast over the goats; one goat would be for making atonement and one for confession of sins and release.

The goat for atonement would be sacrificed to atone for the sins of the people. The high priest would place his hands on the head of the other goat (called the scapegoat) and confess all the sins of the people over it. Another priest would then take the scapegoat into the wilderness and release it and ensure it did not return to camp (or later, to the city). For a long time, the animal was just released into the wilderness and they let nature dictate the method of the goat’s demise. However, later, the priest ensured the scapegoat met a fatal fate. Since this was a symbolism of sin being taken away, they wanted to ensure the animal did not return to civilization because that would indicate their sin had returned.

When Christ atoned for all the sins of all humans on the cross, our sin is forever removed and will never return to us. Scripture says this in Psalm 103:12: “As far as the east is from the west, so far has he removed our transgressions from us.” One can travel north and will eventually start to travel south once the North Pole is reached. Yet, when one travels east or west, one can travel in that direction forever without going in the opposite direction. This is what the psalmist is conveying here. The distance between east and west is infinite, and, therefore, so is the distance of our sins from God. God even says that he will remember our sin no more: “For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more” (Hb 8:12).

This sacrifice therefore represented one’s sin being forever removed.

But what about our human nature? We still have it even after we accept Christ as our Savior and future hope. Was there a plan for accounting for our sinful human nature? Of course! Join me next time and we’ll discuss how clever God really was—and is!

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

A required drink offering was required for several of the sacrifices that were made. This offering was made of strong wine (Nu 28:7). It was not to be diluted, which speaks of the purity and perfection of the offering, as well as of its preciousness (costlier than what was normally drank). All of it was poured out onto the sacrifice. Wine is a symbol of joy for both man and God (Jd 9:13; Ps 104:15). It was to be instituted only after they dwelt in the Promised Land (Nu 15:1) – because only then would they have vineyards to obtain the grapes to make wine. It was only offered with the “sweet savor” offerings (Nu 15:1-16): i.e., burnt offering, meal offering, and peace offering. It was not used with a sin offering or guilt offering because God has no joy in our sin.

The drink offering was instituted as a symbol of completion and pointed to a future completion. This was done by God who takes joy in doing this for us. Matthew said this about Jesus: “And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Mt 26:27).

Christ’s blood was a drink offering, meaning it was a completion of something which had been started earlier. His death was the completion of what the sacrifices in Leviticus pointed toward—i.e., the payment for mankind’s sin. Even in the New Testament it is a symbol of joy and completion and the initiation of new beginnings: “Fixing our eyes on Jesus, the pioneer and perfector of faith. For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God” (Hb 12:2). The cross wasn’t the joy but what he endured to get to the joy, i.e., being with us forever. This offering therefore represents the joy of our restoration.

So, you see, God was intimately involved with us coming to him. After all, it was all his idea to restore us to himself. Us coming back to him gives him great joy. When we’re forgiven of our sin, what happens to that sin? Join me next time for that discussion.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The guilt offering was very similar to the sin offering: “The guilt offering is just like the sin offering; there is one law for them” (Lv 7:7). Although the offering was the same, the purpose was quite different. As the sin offering restored one’s standing with God, the guilt offering restored one’s standing with the one who was sinned against. Like the sin offering, it was for a specific sin (Lv 5:15-19).

If any of God’s commandments were broken, once a person realized it, he had to offer a guilt offering. It came with renumeration as well. To the offering he had to add 20% of its worth and give that to the priest. Then he had to make restitution to the one offended by repaying the value of whatever was involved with the sin committed and then add an additional 20% of its value and give that to the one sinned against. The purpose of the guilt offering was to absolve the offender of all legal and moral debt, and it restored one’s favor to one’s fellow man by absolving the guilt of the sin committed.

Whereas the sin offering had a vertical application, the guilt offering had a horizontal application. Paul stated that because we have forgiveness through Christ, we should do the following in our relationship to others: Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with every form of malice (Ep 4:31). And Jesus stated that if that was not the case then we have mending to do: “So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift” (Mt 5:23-24).

While Christ’s death cancels our moral and legal debt, it does even more! Paul tells us this: “He [Christ] was delivered over to death for our sins and was raised to life for our justification.” (Ro 4:25). We often state that Christ took care of our sin problem. Yet, we need to remember that he also took care of our guilt problem as well. This sacrifice therefore represents restoration of one being able to communicate with others without residual guilt.

So far, we have seen that our standing with God has been corrected, our relationship with him has been restored so we can communicate unhindered and even have a restored relationship with our neighbors. Does God have a significant part in all this other than Jesus’ death? Join me next time for the answer.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The sin offering (Lv 4:1-35) was offered for the sin as the name implies. Yet what is sin? God defined it this way: doing any of the things the LORD commanded not to be done (Lv 4:1).

Yet, Scripture tells us this type of offering was performed for a sin of ignorance. It could be offered for the entire congregation, or for the ruler, or for the common people. If offering for an individual, it had to be a male or female lamb or goat, and it had to be accompanied by a burnt offering. Again, this shows the reason we desire God to act, because we are devoted to him.

What does “a sin of ignorance” mean? This means this sacrifice was for an unknown sin, that is, committing something at the time and not realizing it was a sin. This sacrifice could not be made for a willful sin. There was no sacrifice for a willful sin.

Forgiveness of willful sin did occur, and we have examples of that in Scripture, but there was a requirement that the individual be truly repentant. For example, King David was forgiven for his sin with Bathsheba (2Sa 12:13). It would seem only a truly repentant heart was needed and likely, the offering on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) covered willful sin of those truly repentant.

This offering required the fat, liver, & kidneys of the animal to be sacrificed. Again, this is showing one is offering their very essence to God. The remainder of the animal was taken outside the camp (or city) and burned to ashes if it was for a priest or the congregation as a whole. If performed for an individual sin, the flesh of the animal was given to the priests for their consumption. There were several sins mentioned that would be forgiven (Lv 5:2-4): realizing one unknowingly touched something unclean, or someone thoughtlessly took an oath. They had to confess their specific sin (Lv 5:5). This meant this sacrifice could not be done “just in case.” One had to know the sin they committed, even though at the time it was committed, they were unaware of the severeness of their actions. Yet, as soon as they knew their actions were sinful or they violated the Mosaic Law in some way, they were to make this offering for this specific sin.

There was also something unusual about this type of offering that was not true for any of the other offerings. Whatever touched the flesh of the sacrifice became holy or dedicated to the service of God. Therefore, special precautions had to be made for this sacrifice to ensure it did not accidentally touch something it should not touch.

Ignorance is not bliss! And was not allowed to be used as an excuse for sin. We are still held accountable for our sin even if we don’t know we are sinning. Once we become aware, we are to seek forgiveness immediately—just like the Israelites were expected to do.

Sin results in defilement. God stated there were sins which Israel committed which were said to defile the people, the land, and even the dwelling place of God. These were such things as sexual immorality (Lv 18:24-30), bloodshed (Nu 35:29-34), occult practices (Lv 19:31; 20:6), infant sacrifice (Lv 20:1-5), divorce (Jr 3:1), and false worship (Jr 16:18).

The sin offering was necessary to restore one’s broken relationship with God. Just as touching the sin offering made whatever it touched holy, Christ as our sin offering declares us righteous, even though we did nothing to deserve it. Paul said it this way, “Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ (Ro 5:1). This sacrifice therefore represented a restoration of being able to communicate with God.

The way Jesus healed was significant. Was he going against the Mosaic Law when he touched someone to heal them? No, because only he was the only one who could touch the unclean without becoming unclean. Jesus did not become unclean when he touched those unclean. Instead, those who were unclean became clean. Why? Because he was our sin offering. Anything that touched the sin offering became holy, or clean. Their uncleanness, i.e., their sickness, was immediately healed just from Jesus’ touch. See this post: Touch of Jesus. His miracles were just another way of demonstrating how he was fulfilling the Mosaic Law.

We see how the sin offering restored the vertical relationship we have with God, but what about the relationship with those around us. Sometimes our sin, even when done in ignorance, hurts those around us and causes conflict. Was their a sacrifice for that as well? Join me next time and find out.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The peace or fellowship offering (Lv 3:1-17) was a way for an Israelite to express thanks to God, give God a gift, or make a special promise to God. It was offered on the bronze altar, either a male or female herd animal plus bread made with and without yeast. The blood and fat of the animal could not be eaten. These represented one’s life and their very best to be devoted to God. The fat, liver, and kidneys of the animal were sacrificed. These represented one’s devotion to God. In ancient times, the liver represented the essence of one’s life, the kidneys represented one’s inner emotions and seat of one’s inner thoughts, and the fat represented the very best of one’s life. This represented one was giving their very essence to God. Isn’t that what one does when they get to know someone they care deeply about? To really know someone, you share deep thoughts and ideas that you would not share with just anyone.

The offering could only be offered at the tabernacle (or later, the temple) as this represented where God dwelt. The one making the offering was intimately involved with the slaughter of the sacrifice, and the meat of the offering was eaten at the tabernacle or temple in the presence of God to represent one’s fellowship with God.

Christ became our peace offering. As the meal was eaten in God’s presence to represent having fellowship with him, likewise because of Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection, we can have fellowship with him as well. The apostle Paul tells us, “But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he himself is our peace, who has made us both one and has broken down in the flesh the dividing wall of hostility” (Ep 2:13-14). This is saying that both Jew and Gentile are one and have fellowship with each other and with Christ in the same way. This sacrifice therefore represents our Fellowship with God.

We have seen how the first three sacrifices reveal our now right standing with God, our devotion to him, and how we share out deepest thoughts with him. Is there more? Join me next time and find out.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The grain offering was the second offering mentioned in Leviticus (Lv 2:1-26). It was made and presented in one of three ways: (1) fine flour with olive oil and frankincense presented uncooked (Lv 2:1). This was symbolic of the Holy Spirit and prayer. It had to be fine flour because it represented the very best—the most work required to produce this quality of flour; (2) baked in the oven (Lv 2:4); or (3) baked on a griddle (Lv 2:5).

The one making the offering would take a handful (called the memorial portion) and the priest would burn it on the altar (Lv 2:2). The remainder (called the most holy part) was then given to the priests to use for their own consumption (Lv 2:3). Yeast and honey were prohibited (typically representing sin and pride) as this type of sacrifice was to be offered with humility. Salt was a requirement (substance that helped to give it flavor) to represent one’s usefulness when yielded to God.

Israel was dependent upon God for their food supply: they received manna for food when in the wilderness and rain for growth of crops when in Promised Land. Christ’s body represented the true bread from heaven. Christ said about himself: “Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world” (Jn 6:51). His words demonstrate to us that Christ was the “memorial part” because he offered himself to die on the cross for us. He was also the “most holy part” because we partake of him symbolically as we follow him and his words. Paul said, “. . . Speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ” (Ep 4:15). We mature into even thinking like Christ (1Co 2:16) and having his perspective of the world and those around us.

So, by identifying with Christ and becoming more like him, we mature in the faith and operate in the power of the Holy Spirit. Paul put it this way in Colossians 2:14-15: “Having canceled the charge of our legal indebtedness, which stood against us and condemned us; he has taken it away, nailing it to the cross, and having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.” With our maturity comes power that the Holy Spirit gives us to overcome our spiritual enemy, Satan.

The grain offering therefore represents our growth in Christ, or our sanctification.

What other heart transformations are needed? Join me next time as we discuss this train of thought.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The burnt offering was the first sacrifice mentioned in Leviticus (Lv 1:1-17). It could be offered in two ways: (1) a personalized offering by an individual with only males allowed to make this offering—likely on behalf of their whole family (e.g., Jb 1:5); or (2) as an offering for the community performed on its behalf by the priest. One of the unique characteristics of this offering was that it was totally consumed on the altar. Only the hide could be kept by the priest (Lv 7:8). Often, burnt offerings were required in conjunction with other types of sacrifices.

This type of offering was likely the offering God had Adam and Eve offer because he used the skin of the animal to make their clothing. It was the offering mentioned in Scripture by Noah (Gen. 8:20) when exiting the ark. It was frequently offered by the patriarchs long before the Mosaic Law was established. The Lord instructed Abraham to offer Isaac as a burnt offering (Gen. 22:2) and would have been the offering Moses performed in the desert after leaving Egypt (Ex. 5:3). Both Jethro (Ex. 18:12), Moses’ father-in-law, and Job (Job 1:5) offered this type of sacrifice long before the giving of the Law at Sinai.

It was continually offered as a perpetual sacrifice: night and day; on major feast days; and on new moons in Israel. This was a constant reminder that they were God’s people and were devoted to him.

So, what was the reason for this type of offering? It was made for man’s depravity (his sinful state). It was needed for one to be able to approach God. Christ became our burnt offering to restore our right standing with God by allowing us to be transferred from Satan’s Kingdom (which Adam yielded to him through his rebellion in the garden) into Christ’s Kingdom. Read my post, Are We Going Backwards? for more details on this topic. It was something Old Testament saints looked toward because they went to Sheol upon death. Because of Christ being our burnt offering, we go to be with him immediately (2Co 5:8) because our trust in Christ transfers us into his Kingdom. The apostle Paul tells us in Colossians 1:13, “For he has rescued us from the dominion of darkness and brought us into the Kingdom of the Son he loves.”

The burnt offering was a principle of particularity. God, not man, dictates how we will and can approach Him. Jesus Christ said, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (Jn 14:6).

It was a principle of acceptance of God. Self-help books tell how a person should accept themselves so they can feel better about themselves and overcome their depressive state or their lack of confidence, while the burnt offering was all about making a person right with God and seeing things from his perspective. We are more likely to feel good about ourselves and feel relevant because we are working within God’s design for us. Romans 3 :10 tells us, “There is no one righteous, not even one.” We are incapable of approaching God on our own merit.

It was a principle of atonement and transfer of state through the shedding of blood. Hebrews 9:22 tells us, that without the shedding of blood there is no remission, or forgiveness, of sin. Blood represented life. One was giving life for life as one’s sins were symbolically transferred to the animal. Our sins (past, present, and future sins) were transferred onto Christ as he hung on the cross (1Pt 2:24).

It was a principle of identification. The one making the offering had to identify with the animal and symbolically transfer his sin to the animal which is then worthy of death. We, today, identify with Christ who bore our sin and died for our sin. Paul tells us in Philippians 2:6-7: “Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage; rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.” Christ identified with us in order to die for us in our place because our sins were transferred to him as he hung on the cross.

It was a principle of sacrifice. Neither the one making the offering, nor the priest benefited from this type of sacrifice. What was gained was a statement of devotion to God. We, too, are to offer ourselves as a living sacrifice to him. Romans 12:1 says, “Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship.”

The burnt offering is, therefore, a symbol of our transfer into God’s kingdom. And this was the reason it was required in conjunction with other sacrifices to show one’s rightful standing with God for God to act. This sacrifice made the other sacrifices possible.

So, once we are in his kingdom, what comes next? Join me next time and find out.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Many people make a commitment to read through their Bible cover to cover. They do great until they reach the book of Leviticus. Then their eyes roll, and they feel they have entered the Biblical wasteland. Words couldn’t be drier and the relatability to what is being read seems nonexistent. What is the purpose of such a book and how is it even relevant to us today? Believe it or not, it is highly relevant and reveals how blessed we are to be living post Christ’s crucifixion than before. Let’s take a closer look and see if I can make Leviticus become relevant for you. You may just never see this book the same way again. Wouldn’t that be nice!

The Mosaic Law was comprised of 613 commandments dealing with moral and ethical issues. Most of these were tied, whether directly or indirectly, to some type of sacrifice. There were eight different types of sacrifices or offerings that were required for different things. Sometimes, more than one sacrifice had to be made simultaneously. Likely you realized from your reading of Leviticus that sacrifices were a big part of this book and were crucial to the everyday life of a Jewish citizen. It all seems so confusing. It was likely more comprehensible for a Jew of that day as they grew up with these requirements. But why? What was the purpose of such sacrifices and so much detail as to how they were to be done?

Well, fast forward to the New Testament. Because of Christ’s teachings, many started to think he was advocating for the Jews to abandon the Mosaic Law. Yet, he told them that was not the case. Actually, far from abandoning the Law, he had come to fulfill the Law: Jesus stated, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Mt 5:17-18).

You may be thinking that if that was true, and he was such an advocate of the Mosaic Law, then why did Jesus argue with the Pharisees so much? The Pharisees were obsessed with keeping the Law, so shouldn’t that have been a common bond, a common thread, between them? Well, we need to look more closely as to what Jesus argued with them about. Their arguments were not about the Law but about Oral Traditions which the Pharisees elevated to be as binding as the Law itself. By doing so, they lost the true intent of the Torah, the Law. The Pharisees (and the Sadducees) had turned obeying the Mosaic Law into a list of dos and don’ts rather than about the condition of one’s heart. They taught that the doing was what made one righteous rather than an actual change of heart. Jesus was teaching the original intent of Torah, the Mosaic Law, was to expose the condition of one’s heart. Following the Law was to be a response of realizing one’s heart condition. The Pharisees were putting the cart before the horse, so to speak.

If we go back to Leviticus, we find there were eight different types of offerings required under the Mosaic Law. Why so many? What was their purpose? Did Jesus really fulfill all of them? How did he do that, and for what purpose was he to fulfill them?

To answer these questions, we need to look at each of these different types of sacrifices, their requirements, and what they represented. I think you’ll see that each addresses a matter of the heart. Each sacrifice was to be a response to a change in heart.

Let’s look at each of these sacrifices individually. I have covered them previously in another series of blog posts (Leviticus), but our emphasis in this discussion will be slightly different. I hope you join me as we discuss how Jesus Christ fulfilled each of these types of offerings and how each relates to our accepting him today.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

There are many who feel the Old Testament is quite passé and irrelevant for us today. Yet such a belief couldn’t be farther from the truth. Let’s go over some of these thoughts and see if we can decipher the legitimacy of the rationale behind them.

It is sometimes stated that the Old Testament is about something that happened so long ago that the stories and information have no relevance for us today. The apostle Paul had a different opinion about this: “Now these things [Old Testament teachings] occurred as examples to keep us from setting our hearts on evil things as they did (1Co 10:6). So, since God does not change (Ml 3:6), then how God acted in the examples provided in the Old Testament can be used to help guide our actions today as well.

Some say that God in the Old Testament was a vengeful God and quite different from the God of love portrayed to us in the New Testament. Yet is that really true? Have you actually read why God made certain decisions he did in the Old Testament? Also, consider that the Old Testament covers things that happened over a 4000-year time span whereas the New Testament covers only a period of less than 100 years. Therefore, you would have far more examples to draw from in the Old Testament as to how God acts than you do in the New Testament. I have talked about this in more detail in a previous post (Is God a God of Wrath?). I think the bottom line is that there are eventual consequences to one’s sin and God, while longsuffering, will eventually declare a reckoning to be done. This was true of both Gentiles (e.g., he gave the Amorites 500 years before their reckoning came [Gn 15:13-16]) as well as the Israelites (e.g., both the northern kingdom of Israel [2Ki 17:6] and the southern kingdom of Judah [25:11] were taken captive by foreigners) because of their disobedience to God. This will also be true in our future as well, which some call the time of Jacob’s Trouble (Jr 30:7) or the time of the Tribulation (Mt 24:21; Rv 7:14).

Some say the Old Testament was about Israel, but the New Testament Church has replaced her within God’s plan, so the Old Testament is irrelevant for us today. But is that really the case? The apostle Paul seems to disagree with this assessment. God has not rejected Israel (Ro 11:1) and at a future date, all of Israel will be saved (Ro 11:26). God has a plan for both the nation of Israel and his Church, his bride. This is somewhat explained in a previous post (Gentiles – World View). God’s plan for us and the entire world is far greater than we can imagine and his love for all of mankind is also greater than we can imagine.

There is another point to make about the connection between the Old Testament and New Testament. There is a saying attributed to St. Augustine: The Old Testament is the New Testament concealed; the New Testament is the Old Testament revealed. This is quite literally true. There are many prophecies in the Old Testament about the Jew’s coming Messiah. The New Testament reveals all these prophecies were fulfilled in Jesus Christ (see Prophecies of the Messiah).

Others argue Jesus made the Old Testament null and void at his coming. Yet Jesus stated that he did not come to abolish the Mosaic Law but to fulfill it in exact detail (Mt 5:17-18). The apostle Paul agreed with this when he said, “Christ is the culmination of the law so that here may be righteousness for everyone who believes” (Ro 10:4). Because Jesus Christ fulfilled the law, we are reconciled to God and are now declared righteous because of his actions on the cross. Jesus was everything the Mosaic Law required and fulfilled all the requirements necessary. He became the culmination of the Mosaic Law requirements.

So, you can see that the Old Testament is really important for us today just as is the New Testament. Without understanding the former we can’t truly appreciate the latter. Jesus is on every page of both the Old Testament and the New Testament, so it’s likely we need to understand how the Old Testament pointed to him and how the New Testament reveals him. We’ll be exploring this fact over the next several posts. I hope you join me.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

In the last couple of posts, we have shown that our position as God made us, and our partnership with angels give us authority that makes us useful warriors in the army of the Lord. Just what kind of authority do we have? Let’s explore that topic today.

Listen to what the Apostle Paul told the church at Ephesus, “I keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father, may give you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that you may know him better. I pray that the eyes of your heart may be enlightened in order that you may know the hope to which he has called you, the riches of his glorious inheritance in his holy people, and his incomparably great power for us who believe. That power is the same as the mighty strength he exerted when he raised Christ from the dead and seated him at his right hand in the heavenly realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, and every name that is invoked, not only in the present age but also in the one to come. And God placed all things under his feet and appointed him to be head over everything for the church, which is his body, the fullness of him who fills everything in every way” (Ep 1: 17-23, NIV).

Did you get that? He said God has given us “great power” if we put our faith and trust in Christ Jesus. How did he do that? He disarmed the powers and authorities who had control of us and made a public spectacle of them by taking on our sins on the cross. This allowed him to forgive us and cancel the legal charges Satan had against us which condemned us to be forever separated from God (Cl 2:13-15). He now strengthens us with his power and qualifies us to share in his inheritance in the kingdom of light (Cl 1:11-12). In Ephesians, we read: “And God raised us up with Christ and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus” (Ep 2:6). Therefore, we have been made joint-heirs with Christ, and Paul goes on to say we have been given authority with the same power that raised Christ from the dead if we yield to the power of the Holy Spirit (Ep 1:19-20).

Christ is the head of his Church and we, as part of his Church, are part of his body. He is above all rule, authority, power, and dominion. As his body, we also can overcome these forces as well by using spiritual weapons he has given us. Paul tells us we have the power to demolish strongholds (1Co 10:4-5). These are thoughts and arguments that Satan has set up to go against the knowledge of God. Paul is telling us we have the power to destroy them. We do this in concert with angels (Why Should We Care About Angels) by putting on and utilizing the spiritual armor and tools God has given us (Ep 6:10-20). We don’t plea and beg for God to answer our prayer, but we pray in the authority and power he has given us. Jesus’ words are powerful and cut to one’s very core (Hb 4:12), and angels respond to his words (Ps 103:20). Jesus’ name is powerful and one day all will confess his name and lordship just by being in his presence (Pp 2:9-11). And there is power in his blood to cleanse (1Pt 1:18-19), forgive, and one day all will confess his name and his lordship (Cl 3:17), and his blood protects us and helps us overcome spiritual attacks (Rv 12:11).

So, if you have placed your trust and hope in the Lord Jesus Christ, you, my friend, have far more power than you may think. We are now able to have the mind of Christ (1Co 2:26) which means we can see and act in the way Christ would. And if we resist the devil and his forces by utilizing the power Christ has given us and utilize the armor he has bestowed to us, the devil will most definitely flee (Ja 4:7). This is not always easy because we can never let our guard down or give the devil a foothold in our lives (Ep 4:27) because he will most definitely take any and all advantages he can. But we definitely have authority to push back. So, let’s do so. The rewards are far greater for us if we do than if we do not. It is always darkest before the dawn, but that dawn is coming, and it is coming soon.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

In our previous post, we began a discussion about Christian authority and whether we were created lower than angels. Now, let’s look at the second argument we mentioned: since the archangel Michael did not go against Satan when disputing over the body of Moses (Ju 9), this is an example many use to claim we do not have the authority to go against Satan either.

There is an important point to consider: Michael likely did not fight with Satan in this instance because of the difference in their rank, not necessarily because Michael was not willing, or able, to fight Satan. After all, we see that one future day Michael will fight and defeat Satan (Rv 12:7-9). Michael was likely putting Satan in his place, by implying with his words that God was superior to Satan and had the ultimate say. Since Satan was trying to use his authority being over Adam’s kingdom (see previous post), Michael was reminding Satan that his authority was limited.

In a previous post, I also showed how Christians work with angels and we each have a role in God’s ultimate plan (God Uses Both Christians and Angels to Accomplish His Plan). Our actions can be just as powerful as those of angels. In some ways, we are examples to them (1Co 4:9; 1Pt 1:12). Also, angels respond to God’s word, so when we pray God’s word, we activate angels as well because they obey his words, and his words do not return empty (Ps 103:20; Is 55:11).

There are many types and ranks of angels and each have their specific duties which God has given them (Partnering with Angels). Yet, while we may not be able to see them, we work with them to achieve God’s overarching plan. So, while they are more powerful than us humans in a physical sense, we have just as much responsibility and spiritual power if we work in concert with them obeying the will of Christ in our lives.

Besides, we often quote 1 John 4:4, “You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world (NIV).” This implies that we do have authority through the Holy Spirit to go against Satan and the angels who follow him.

So, now that we have addressed the counterargument to the notion that we as followers of Christ have authority, what kind of authority do we actually have? We’ll explore that next time. I hope you come along with me for that discussion.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

There seems to be some controversy over what spiritual authority Christians actually have. Some claim that Christians must be careful because angels are more powerful than humans so we should not overstep our authority. Often, two pieces of Scripture are used to support this tenant:

1.      Psalm 8:4-5 (NIV) – what is mankind that you are mindful of them, human beings that you care for them? You have made them a little lower than the angels and crowned them with glory and honor.

2.      Jude 9 (NIV) – But even the archangel Michael, when he was disputing with the devil about the body of Moses, did not himself dare to condemn him for slander but said, “The Lord rebuke you!”

So, is this correct, or are there arguments to these supporting Scriptures?

Well, yes, there are counter arguments. Yet, we also need to understand that Scripture does not contradict itself. So, how can we have a counter argument to this but still not contradict Scripture at the same time?

To look at this, there are several aspects we need to consider.

If we look at the Hebrew word for “angel” we find that it is almost always the word malak (which means messenger), except for Psalm 8:5 where the word is elohim (which everywhere else in Scripture this word is translated God or god). For this reason, there are some translations of Psalm 8:5 that have it read, “You have made him a little lower than God and crowned him with glory and honor” (G&H).

The reason for the “discrepancy” is how certain words are interpreted. Just as in English, a word can mean different things depending upon its context. If we look at these words more literally, we get something like this: What is a mere mortal that you think of him? Or the son of a man, that you care for him? For you have made him a little god and crowned him with glory and honor. The text then goes on to show the glory and honor given: all the animal kingdoms of the earth are under man.

That creates a new way of looking at this verse, doesn’t it? I think the main point here is that human beings are subservient to God and there is no real reason for God to have any concern for us, but contrary to how things look, God does care about us, and cares about us deeply.

Why did the biblical scholars translate the word elohim, which is almost always translated as God to be translated as angels in only this Old Testament verse? I can’t say for sure, but it may partly be due to how the writer of Hebrews used this verse. Yet, this writer modified the quote slightly. Hebrews 2:6-9 (NIV) says “But there is a place where someone has testified: ‘What is mankind that you are mindful of them, a son of man that you care for him? You made them a little lower than the angels; you crowned them with glory and honor and put everything under their feet.’ In putting everything under them, God left nothing that is not subject to them. Yet at present we do not see everything subject to them. But we do see Jesus, who was made lower than the angels for a little while, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.”

The New Testament is written in Greek, so the word for angel is not the same actual word as used in Psalms. The Greek word used here for “angels” is angelos and is the word used almost exclusively for a word meaning messengers and can therefore be talking about spiritual beings or humans depending upon their capacity and role as a messenger.

Is this a discrepancy between this passage in Psalms and Hebrews? Well, no. Why? When God created mankind, i.e., Adam and Eve, they were created lower than God, not necessarily lower than angels. It’s hard to compare rank when their roles are so different. Power and strength are not necessarily the same. For example, we say that a king is the most powerful person of a kingdom, but that does not mean he is so in actual strength. There are many under him who could easily defeat and overthrow him, but they are loyal to his leadership and commands. They are subservient to the king, although not necessarily weaker than the king. God was giving Adam the kingdom of the Earth. Yet, when Adam rebelled, his status changed because his actions turned his kingdom over to Satan.

This is the point the writer of Hebrews is making. Jesus Christ was not made lower than God because he is God (Jn 10:30). He was placed where Adam placed all his descendants: lower than the angels, and within Satan’s domain.

Why did Adam’s position change? What exactly did he do that resulted in such a drastic turn of events? He rebelled. Can eating a piece of fruit really be classified in the same category as a coup? To answer that, we need to understand the definition of rebellion. One of its simplest definitions is going against authority. What did Adam do? We went against God’s authority, against God’s will (see Are We Going Backwards?). In some ways, the position of Adam and Satan changed. Rather than humans being born in Adam’s kingdom, we are now all born into Satan’s kingdom. How do we know this? One way to know is understanding that when Satan tempted Christ in the wilderness, he offered Christ the kingdoms of this world (Mt 4:8-10). How did he obtain these kingdoms? From Adam (Lessons Moses and Elijah Give Us).

In addition, Jesus himself stated that he did not come into the world to condemn the world because we are already condemned (Jn 3:18). That is why we don’t need to do anything to be lost forever, because we already are! But we must make a decision to be transferred into God’s kingdom (Struggle for the World). Satan has cleverly made us believe that we must choose to be with him or be with God. Therefore, many people say, “Well I certainly don’t won’t to have anything to do with Satan, but I’m not sure I’m ready to turn my will over to God either,” like they are in their own domain and can decide to follow Satan, Christ, or themselves. Satan is the father of lies (Jn 8:44). You only have one choice. Remain in your current state which leads to destruction and forever separated from God and all those you love or yield to the prompting of the Holy Spirit and receive Jesus Christ as your Savior. That’s when you are transferred into His kingdom and will be with him forever.

Before we go further, let’s look at the second verse provided above. We’ll do that next time. I hope you join me.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

Over the last several posts, we have talked about what happens when individuals experience God’s glory and about a near future date when God’s glory will be poured out upon the earth in a big way. Is there a difference between God’s glory and God’s spirit?

The two are connected, but there seems to be a difference as well. We understand that the Trinity is intricately interconnected. Jesus stated that if we have seen him, we have seen the Father (Jn 14:9), and the writer of Hebrews states that Jesus is a reflection of God’s glory (Hb 1:3). Also, the Holy Spirit is called the Spirit of Glory (1Pt 4:14) and is a Spirit of power enabling Christ to be raised from the dead (Ro 1:4). So, despite all these interconnections, what is the difference when it comes to experiencing God’s glory and God’s Spirit?

If we look at our past posts, those who experienced God’s glory fell to their faces in worship as they felt unworthy to be in God’s presence. His glory humbles us and puts us into a place where we can worship God in purity of intent without any hidden agenda. Yet, we find when people experienced God’s Spirit, they became empowered to act in a way that is pleasing to God and uphold God in the highest regard.

There were also physical manifestations when humans experienced God’s Spirit. In Acts chapter 2 we see that “tongues of fire” fell upon Christ’s disciples, they spoke in other languages, became embolden to proclaim Jesus Christ to the masses and many people came to believe in Jesus Christ that day. In many other encounters in Scripture, speaking in tongues was a manifestation of their experience of receiving God’s Holy Spirit, and many signs and wonders manifested as well. That was not always the case, but it did occur quite often. Why is that not seen today as well? This was covered in a previous post (Kingdom Age), so I will not go over that again here. I refer you to that post.

I will also point out that while the two are different, they do work in concert. God’s glory humbles people and helps them to understand their hopeless position compared to who God is, and that all praise must go to God because he is the all-in-all. Once an individual understands they are nothing compared to him, then God’s Spirit can use that person and make them a powerful instrument for God, embolden them to teach about who God is, his love for mankind, and how to help others come to him.

So, it seems we are poised for a time no one has ever witnessed before. God’s glory is going to fill the earth bringing in the greatest harvest of souls ever experienced by helping humans understand their place with God which will increase their desire to know him. Then God’s Spirit will empower those who come to him to go and be his ambassadors to their fellow humans to help them experience both God’s glory and God’s Spirit as well.

This will be a remarkable time in which to live. Are you ready for it?

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

I read a verse which I had read many times before, but the words suddenly stunned me. This was when Moses was interceding for the Israelites asking God to forgive them for their sin of rebellion by not entering the Promised Land due to the bad report ten of the twelve spies gave when they returned from spying out the land which God had promised them. “The LORD replied, ‘I have forgiven them, as you asked. Nevertheless, as surely as I live and as surely as the glory of the LORD fills the whole earth, not one of those who saw my glory and the signs I performed in Egypt and in the wilderness but who disobeyed me and tested me ten times—not one of them will ever see the land I promised an oath to their ancestors. No one who has treated me with contempt will ever see it’” (Nu 14:20-23).

Now the word translated here as “fills” in the Hebrew means “will be filled.” So, it seems to be a future action and not a present action. It seems God is making a contrast here. While the Israelites experienced God’s glory through the various miracles he performed for them, they did not esteem him and trust him to carry them through. Yet, at some future point, God’s glory will become so profound that it will seem to fill the entire earth and will not be able to be denied as the Israelites had done.

Now, to my knowledge, that has not yet been fulfilled. As we saw in the last post, God’s glory is displayed constantly for us to see. Yet, this particular verse seems to imply something different, something more dramatic. Are there other references for this within Scripture? Yes. Yes, there is.

In Psalms, we read, “Praise be to his glorious name forever; may the whole earth be filled with his glory. Amen and Amen” (Ps 72:19). Again, this seems to indicate some event to occur at a future time.

In Isaiah, when he experienced God and the seraphim surrounding God’s throne, we read, “And they [seraphim] were calling to one another: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the LORD Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory’” (Is 6:3). Since this is occurring in heaven where there is no time element, this is an exclamation in the present even though as we see from other verses, this will be an event in our future.

Then in Habakkuk we read, “For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the LORD as the waters cover the sea” (Hk 2:14). Again, Habakkuk seems to imply a time in his future which this would occur and just how impactful it will be. And, so, it seems, it is still a time future for us as well. Yet, it may be closer than you think.

Some may claim this proclamation of God’s glory filling the earth is referring to Christ’s millennial kingdom when he will be the King of kings reigning over the entire earth from Jerusalem. Yet, there are additional verses within Scripture that talk about this time in our future describing it to be somewhat different from this time described by the verses we have identified above. The timing seems to be tied to what is described in Daniel chapter 7 where one of the verses states, “Then the sovereignty, power and greatness of all the kingdoms under heaven will be handed over to the holy people of the Most High” (Da 7:27). This is in reference to the fourth beast which Daniel saw in a vision that was different from any beast he had ever seen. God stated he would destroy this beast and turn its rule over to “the holy people,” that is, those who follow him. You can learn more about this aspect from a previous post I did (Kingdom Age).

Now if there is a time coming where God will reveal his glory in a miraculous and marvelous way, wouldn’t it be at least implied in the New Testament? Well, I think it is there. I think many times we gloss over its reference because many of us haven’t been taught about such an event occurring. Perhaps Jesus was implying such a time when he taught his disciples how to pray. He first says, “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven” (Mt 6:10). Many say Christ is referring to his millennial rule here. Yet, that would be Christ’s kingdom, not necessarily God’s kingdom. Perhaps Christ is referring to this time where God’s glory will be spread out over the entire world in a tangible way, just like his glory is spread out over the entire heavenly realm. So, maybe our view of what Jesus was praying needs a little re-thought on our part.

Another aspect to consider is that when God’s glory was experienced by anyone, it brought them to obeisance and a feeling of unworthiness causing one to bow in reverence. Yet, when Christ rules, God’s spirit will instead empower individuals. We’ll talk more about this in a future post.

In addition, it seems Jesus prophesied about this aspect of God’s glory filling the earth as well when he was telling his disciples about future events. He says, “And this gospel of the kingdom will be peached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come” (Mt 24:14). Many claim this is Christ speaking of the evangelism that will occur during the Tribulation period through the leadership of the 144,000 evangelists that Christ will raise up to evangelize the whole world (Rv 7, 14). Yet, after speaking about this time, Christ goes on to talk about what will occur after this time, so it seems the time spoken of here is before the Tribulation period and may likely be the time of God pouring out his glory over the earth.

Why did the apostle Paul not talk about such a time occurring? I addressed this in a previous post (Church Age). He likely assumed he was already in such a time because God had poured his spirit out and much of what will occur when God pours out his spirit again was already occurring. Yet, one of the things he said to Titus likely helps us to understand that he began to understand this time of God pouring out his glory was not yet occurring (Empowerment of the Holy Spirit). He told Titus to teach what Jesus had taught them until God’s glory has manifested itself to purify a people for his very own (Tt 2:11-14).

So, it seems we are on the cusp of something wonderful that God will bring upon our world and upon us. Are you ready for it? Are you excited about it? I’m reminded about a scene from the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey where the question was asked, “What’s going to happen?” The simple response was, “Something wonderful.” Well, that’s what’s going to happen here: something wonderful. Do you plan on being around to experience it? I trust you will.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

In our last post, we saw examples of God’s glory being manifested in a physical way, typically as a type of cloud or mist. We also talked about one of the aspects of God’s glory being that it should produce awe, respect, and worship of God himself. Yet, there is another aspect to God’s glory, and that is its ubiquitous nature.

What do I mean by that? I mean God’s glory is all around us. The apostle Paul stated it this way: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse” (Ro 1:20). What is he saying? All of creation around us testifies to us of God’s power and divinity being reflected back to us, that is, God’s glory is on display all around us 24/7.

“Wait a minute,” you may say. “I was taught that all of creation was happenstance. Given enough time, chance itself will yield such a creation.” Well, the short answer is “no.” Evolution is adaptation not creation. Even the laws of thermodynamics agree with this. Matter naturally goes from order to chaos—not vice versa. And, if you understand how living things are created, you will come to the realization that these same laws apply. For example, you need proteins to make proteins. And if that is the case, where did the first protein come from? Oh, amino acids by chance came together in the right order to produce a protein. But that is only half the solution. You not only need protein, but proteins configured in just the right conformation: one structure to carry the unfolded protein into another protein structure to fold the protein into its proper 3-D configuration. You can look further at this argument here (Fingerprint of God-Part 1).

But that is only the beginning of the complexity of all that exists around us. When one looks at the structure of matter, it is, of course, composed of atoms, nature’s basic building blocks. Yet, atoms are a conundrum of existence. What keeps an atom together? There are forces within its nucleus that help to achieve this, but again, even an atom is quite complex, and the right atoms being formed by happenstance is also an infinitesimally small probability. You can look further into this argument here (When God Removes His Fingerprint). So, part of God’s glory is him holding all of creation together. The writer of Hebrews states this is a function of none other than Jesus Christ himself (Hb 1:2-3) who also reflects to us God’s glory. Therefore, us accepting Christ helps us to accept his glory at the same time.

What does all this mean for us? It means that seeing all of nature around us, seeing the cosmos above us, hearing the wind, smelling the fragrances that waft on the breeze, and touching the delicate flowers that bloom in our garden beds, and understanding the complexities of all these things gives testimony to us of God’s glory. It is undeniable and will be a testimony against us as we stand before God one day to give an account of our lives. He will require proof of why you did not believe these things. Do you have that? Or are you just going off the saying of someone else? Have you taken your “logic” to the very end of that logic trail? If you investigate thoroughly, that trail does not lead you where you think it leads. If you are honest with yourself and your trail of logic, it will lead you to God, to his glory, and to Jesus Christ himself.

So, this is the second aspect of God’s glory. It is both tangible yet ubiquitous. It is both something you feel, but also something you see. It is not the element of seeing alone that helps you to understand God’s glory in these elements, but what you can’t see about these elements that helps you to display the awe, respect, and worship toward God that he deserves. Paul said this in Colossians: “For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible” (Cl 1:16). While part of what Paul is describing is the spiritual aspects of the invisible, it can encompass the physical invisible forces he created to hold all that we see, appreciate, admire, and cherish together.

There is also a third element to God’s glory that we will explore next time. I hope you join me.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

According to Strong’s Concordance, there are at least a dozen different Hebrew words in the Old Testament translated to mean “glory,” and at least seven Greek words in the New Testament translated as “glory.” Yet, there is only one that is most associated with God when a biblical author is describing the glory of God. That Hebrew word is kavod and the Greek word meaning the same is doxa.

The other words are often used to describe one’s splendor, grandeur, loudness, beauty, prominence, ampleness, or honor. These can be used as in either a good or bad connotation. Other usages are presented in their negative connotation, such as being boastful, self-centered, or prideful. When used in a derogatory way, their usage leads us to contrast those traits to God’s glory and see how mankind falls short of the ideal concept of the term “glory.”

So, what does the “glory of God” actually mean or connote? The root of the word implies a heaviness. But this is not our standard use of the word but a usage to imply respect, awe, and honor in the most reverent of ways and attitude that leads one to both worship and praise God.

There are three ways Scripture utilizes the phrase “glory of God.” The first way is as a literal physical entity. In this post, let’s look at a few of these events in Scripture when God’s glory is presented to us in physical form.

When God presented himself to the children of Israel as a cloud with thunder and lightning on Mount Sinai, Scripture describes this as God presenting his glory to them. This revealed the seriousness of worshiping God with respect and honor that is due him. In this instance, it produced actual fear in the heart of each Israelite in addition to the awe his presence evoked (Ex 19:16). Hearing God speak was so terrifying, they asked Moses to speak with God and then relay his message to them rather than them hearing God speak to them himself (Dt 5:24-27).

When Moses first erected the tabernacle, God’s glory filled it (Ex 40:34-35) with a visible presence that prevented anyone from entering because of the magnificence of God’s presence there. The same thing happened when king Solomon dedicated the first permanent temple for God in Jerusalem (2Ch 5:13-14). In each case, duties withing the tabernacle or temple had to be halted due to God’s presence being so thick within the structure no one could bear to be in it (Ex 40:35; 2Ch 5:14).

The prophet Isaiah also experienced this when he had his vision of standing in God’s holy temple in heaven (Is 6:4) which elicited his cry of just how unholy he was compared to God’s holiness (Is 6:5) which caused him to say, “Woe is me! For I am undone” (Is 6:5). John the revelator also experienced the same phenomenon, and no one could enter the temple due to God’s presence there (Rv 15:8).

The prophet Ezekiel experienced the glory of God both exiting the temple in Jerusalem (Ek 11:22-23) as well as enter the new temple that will one day be erected to worship the Lord God again (Ek 43:4-5). Ezekiel also fell to his face upon his first encounter (Ek 1:28) and was only able to stand and perform due to the help of God’s Spirit (Ek 2:2).

Peter, James, and John experienced the glory of God as a bright cloud as well when Jesus Christ was transfigured before them (Mt 17:5). They, too, fell upon their faces due to the experience (Mt 17:6).

In each of these cases, those who experienced God in this way had a feeling of inadequacy overwhelm them being in God’s presence. The idea of one’s own goodness completely evaporated instantly upon their encounter with God. As we can see, experiencing the presence of God automatically demands respect, awe, and worship. Hence the true meaning of biblical authors using the essence of the word kavod or doxa.

When we pray, this is the attitude we should also have as we approach him. Not that we are afraid of him because, after all, we are his children and co-inheritors with him (Ro 8:17). Even in our day-to-day lives we can, and should, have reverence for those who are over us, like our parents, even though we are close to them and love them greatly. Even more so should we have this attitude toward God himself. May we ever do so.

Next time, we’ll look at another aspect of God’s glory.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

We have been looking at how the people of Israel responded to God sending snakes into their camp as they traveled toward their Promised Land because of their rebellion. Moses makes a brass snake and sets it up on a pole in their midst and the people were asked to look up at it for healing. Why?

God now expects a personal response to him. God enacted a national judgment on Israel because of their rebellion but is now going to reward a personal response to him. Israel was to become an ambassador to the rest of the world (Ex 19:6). Israel would be an example of how God punishes and rewards nations but more importantly, God is now showing them that a personal response to God supersedes a national response to Him. Their individual response to the raised serpent on a pole would set the example for how individuals are to respond to Jesus Christ raised up on the cross. Can you now see why Jesus used this as a example to compare himself being raised up on the cross?

Warning! The cross can also become like Hezekiah looked at Nehushtan: it is just a thing. People often revere the cross but not necessarily the one on the cross: Jesus himself. People look at this as a way of coexisting with those of other religions. I’m sure you have seen the coexist sticker before. It has the cross with the other religion symbols. You can have the cross in this sticker, but you can’t have Jesus Christ within this sticker because he is the only way to God (Ac 4:12). It makes being good equal to being righteous; that way no one is offended. Yet what makes one feel good does not make it true. There is only one truth and that is found within Jesus Christ himself (Jn 14:6). Succumbing to such a trivialization of Christianity to other religions takes away the power offered to us through our relationship with Jesus Christ (Ep 1:19-19).

We must recognize that Christ bore our sins (past, present, and future) on the cross for several reasons:

1.      He appeased the wrath of God. Isaiah 53:11c says, “and he [Messiah] will bear their iniquities.” Also, Romans 5:8-9 says, “But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!”

2.      He shed his blood to atone for our sins. 1 John 4:9-10 says, “This is how God showed his love among is: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him. This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.”

3.      Through him we can confess our sins and he will cleanse us because his blood has already been shed. 1 John 1:9 says, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.”

4.      His act allows God to now declare us righteous—not because of us—but because of Jesus Christ. Romans 3:21-22 says, “But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile.”

5.      We can now have an eternal inheritance with Christ—something we could obtain no other way.

The good news is that it doesn’t end there! Christ rose from the grave defeating Death and Sheol (Hades/Hell). 1 Corinthians 15:55 says, “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?” We no longer go to Sheol upon death but go directly to be with Christ for eternity (2Co 5:8). The apostle Paul tells us in Romans 8:2, “Because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set you free from the law of sin and death.” Also, he tells us in Romans 6:4, “We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.”

And what is our reward? Hearing our Lord and Savior say, “Well done my good and faithful servant.” He’s Waiting! Just for you. He’s calling out to you. What is your answer? I trust you say “yes” to him today.

(Note: all scripture references are from NIV Bible version)

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

We now come to the third usage of Nehushtan: “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him” (Jn 3:14-15).

Now, let’s do a comparison between Nehushtan and Christ’s crucifixion.

First, what was God’s wrath directed toward in each situation? His wrath was against the Israelites rebellion in the wilderness. His wrath was against the sin of all mankind when Christ was on the cross.

Second, what was the instrument God used to absolve his wrath in each situation? He used the poisonous snakes as a means of absolving his wrath for the Israelites in the wilderness. He used the sacrifice of Christ, his sinless son, as a means of absolving his wrath against us.

Third, what was the method required for healing in each situation? Faith was needed for the Israelites in the wilderness to be healed from their snakebite wounds and death. Also, faith is needed for us to be released from our doom of a second (or spiritual) death.

Fourth, who received God’s healing in each situation? For each, it was an individual act. Only those of the Israelites who looked up at the snake on the pole were healed. They had to obey God and face their sin. No one could do it for anyone else, no matter how much they may have loved them or wanted them to look. Everyone had to do that for themselves. The same is true for us today. Accepting Christ’s act of paying for our sins on the cross is an individual decision. No one can do it for you.

If these complaining Israelites had only known how close they were to reaching their Promised Land, they might have held their criticism. They were less than two years away from entering the land they had waited for for almost forty years. They let their frustration get the better of them rather than remembering God’s promises to them. Yet are we not similar in that we do the same? Sometimes we miss out on God’s blessing because we become impatient rather than relying upon His faithfulness.

The Israelites had selective remembrance of what happened to their parents. So, how had God responded to these Israelites’ parents when they refused to enter the Promised Land 38 years prior? God responded to the peoples’ rebellion upon the spies returning from Canaan and Moses pleading for them: “The LORD replied, ‘I have forgiven them, as you asked. Nevertheless, as surely as I live and as surely as the glory of the LORD fills the whole earth, not one of those who saw my glory and the signs I performed in Egypt and in the wilderness but who disobeyed me and tested me ten times—not one of them will ever see the land I promised on oath to their ancestors. No one who has treated me with contempt will ever see it’” (Nu 14:20-23).

What were these ten times and how did God respond to their rebellion? Six times God was merciful with the Israelites’ rebellion:

1. Israel became trapped between Pharaoh’s army and the Red Sea. The people complained that Moses had led them out of bondage to just have them destroyed. God was merciful and helped them by parting the water so they could travel through the Red Sea on dry ground (Ex 14:10-31).

2. Water at Marah was bitter and undrinkable, so the people complained even though days earlier God had saved them from destruction by the hand of Pharaoh. God instructed Moses what to do to make the water sweet and drinkable (Ex 15:22-25).

3. Israelites were hungry in Wilderness of Sin and God sent quails and manna to feed them (Ex 16:1-18).

4. Some Israelites left manna until morning going against what God commanded, and God had the manna spoil (Ex 16:19-20).

5. Some Israelites looked to gather manna on the Sabbath against what God commanded, and God reprimanded them (Ex 16:27-29).

6. No water at Rephidim and God provided water from the Rock (Ex 17:1-7).

God then started imposing national judgment:

7. People made and worshipped a golden calf. 3000 Israelites were slain by the sword (Ex 32:1-27).

8. Israelites complained at Taberah. God had many Israelites burned by fire from the Lord (Nu 11:1-3).

9. Israelites complained about not having meat to eat at Kibroth-Hattaavah. God sent quail but then also a plague (Nu 11:4-6; 31-34).

10. Most Israelites believed the bad report of the 10 spies saying the Promised Land couldn’t be conquered, and God said that those above the age of 20 would not enter the Promised Land (Nu 13:1-33; 14:1-45).

If we look at the location where each of these rebellions occurred, the first six occurred before they reached Mt. Sinai and the others were after they reached Sinai. It seems God was merciful with their rebellion and explained things to them before their encounter with Him at Mt. Sinai. Yet, after their encounter with Him, he started instituting judgment for their rebellion (sin). They were now his people, his ambassadors (Ex 19:6), and they needed to learn to act accordingly.

It seems even after 38 years of having to wait to get to Canaan, their Promised Land, lessons were not learned. God had provided everything for them for 38 years, but they were not grateful. It was not this generation who had been in Egypt, yet they still vocalized the same complaints their fathers and mothers had voiced. Rather than learning from their present, they clung to what they had heard about earthly satisfaction of their past, ignoring the hardships that occurred when they had what they were longing for. They, unfortunately, did not focus on the supernatural blessings God had provided to their fathers and mothers, as well as to themselves. They took for granted their current blessings and took those as normal, mundane. Yet do we not do the same? We focus on what is the here and now rather than the supernatural blessings of now and a guaranteed future of even more blessings to come.

I think the plague of poisonous snakes was the first individual salvation God provided to the Israelites once they had been judged. Therefore, this is a very appropriate one for Jesus to relate to Nicodemus about his crucifixion as our response to him is also an individual act.

We’ll explore this further next time. I hope you join me.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

In the past post, we came to understand why Jesus came to Earth when he did. This now leads us to try and understand a mysterious paradox. The very thing that was causing their suffering was what was placed on the pole for them to look up to for healing. This seems strange, doesn’t it?

Yet this is similar to other requirements God implemented:

The purification requirement for someone who became defiled by blood was to shed blood of an animal for a sacrifice (for example, after menstruation or giving birth, a woman was considered unclean for a time and had to make a blood sacrifice).

The purification requirement for someone who became defiled by a dead body was to mix the ashes from a dead heifer with water for cleansing. Also, the making of the ashes of the red heifer for this cleansing made those who made these ashes unclean, although the use of these ashes once made caused the person on whom the ashes were placed to become clean.

It also is a representation of God’s wrath – he sent the serpents as a punishment for the Israelites’ rebellion and blasphemy.

This brings us to the second usage: “He [Hezekiah] did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, just as his father David had done. He removed the high places, smashed the sacred stones and cut down the Asherah poles. He broke into pieces the bronze snake Moses had made, for up to that time the Israelites had been burning incense to it. (It was called Nehushtan)” (2Ki 18:3-4).

Hezekiah called the brass snake Nehushtan meaning “only a thing of brass.” Why did he call it by this name and have it destroyed? The people burned incense to it. You may be asking, “What is bad about that?” Incense represents prayers (Rv 5:8). A special blend of incense was made for the tabernacle/temple (Ex 30:34-38) because they were to pray only to God.

Burning incense to this brass serpent on a pole was indicating they were praying to it (a symbol of the wrath of God); likely for healing. This shows the people were trying to take God out of their needs and relying on their own effort (their incense). Also, Satan had them deluded that the power of healing was achievable without God.

Hezekiah called it “just a piece of brass” meaning it had no power to heal. Hezekiah had it destroyed because they were not praying to God but to a representation of His wrath against rebellion (sin).

Yet, despite the effort of Hezekiah, the effects of the people’s sin lingered on for several generations. The power over Satan and the power over sin is not easily won. It takes not only a physical act of removal but a change of heart and desire.

The great-great grandson of Hezekiah (Jehoiakim) married a woman named Nehushta (2Ki 24:8). It is likely her name was derived from Nehushtan because the meaning of her name is copper or bronze. This occurred over 100 years after Hezekiah destroyed Nehushtan.

So the idea of Nehushtan bringing life still prevailed even though the shrine was destroyed a long time earlier, and this woman was likely named Nehushta because of this event with the bronze snake Moses placed on a pole even though her name was really glorifying rebellion and not life. The power of sin is eradicated only when one’s view of sin changes.

What about you? Do you have God’s view of sin or one that you have created? If we are really searching for truth, then we need God’s view to permeate ours.

Next time, we’ll see how Jesus compared his death to that of Nehushtan.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

The “cure” God told Moses to construct for the people who were bitten by poisonous snakes was to construct a brass serpent and place it on a pole for the people to look at. One thing to realize is that it took a lot of time for Moses to construct such a brass serpent on a pole. Their salvation from when the solution was announced to when it was implemented took time. It was not immediate.

Moses first had to make the mold: craftsman would be needed to make it look like a snake that could drape over a pole or cross. The brass had to be collected and melted. Once poured, it had to be allowed to cool. While brass was commonly used and the Israelites had obtained much of it from the Egyptians and it could be melted using wood fires, the making of such an elaborate piece would likely have taken several days to a week or more in order to complete the process. How many people died before the brass serpent was on the pole for them to look at?

This is somewhat congruent to the time it took for Jesus’s birth to occur here on the Earth. A lot of time passed from when God first announced Christ’s coming to earth (Gn 3:15) to the time he arrived (Lk 2:11). God says Christ arrived at just the right time. He did not come too late, and he did not come too early. Galatians 4:4-5 says, “But when the set time had fully come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those under the law, that we might receive adoption to sonship.”

So why did Jesus arrive on the Earth when he did? Let’s explore that question. Well, the short answer is only God knows! Yet, there are a few reasons we could mention that could help to explain this:

1.      The Law was needed for mankind to understand they could not save themselves by following a set of rules.

2.      The people were ready for a Messiah (although most were looking for the wrong type of Messiah).

3.      The entire known world was under the domain of Rome and Parthia with both existing in a détente where travel was allowed between the two empires enabling travel over the known world to be allowed with little resistance.

4.      Jews lived in almost all prominent cities of the known world.

So, it seems Jesus arrived on the scene when he was supposed to arrive—not any earlier; not any later. There is a video by Julian Gentry (MK TriciaUGC FB 240318A 16x9 to MK VSL Alt Intro 16x9 1 07x (youtube.com) who gives an explanation as to why Jesus had to have come 2000 years ago and not at any other time in history. Julian is a Christian who works for Ratio Christi in North Carolina ministering to college studies. He also makes YouTube videos of apologetics in defense of the Christian faith. In this video referenced here, he makes two main points: first, this was the time of history that many cultures were looking and worshipping a type of god with many of them having similar characteristics and this was the time that Jesus Christ stepped into history and made a lasting impact which has lasted for over two-thousand years. Second, if Jesus Christ had been just another “god,” then his influence should have waned just like all the other ones did. But he didn’t. He is still impacting people in a positive light even today.

That fact is something we can’t really ignore. I hope you don’t either.

Next time, we’ll look at how Nehushtan is, indeed, a mysterious paradox.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens