Once the Israelites reached their promised land, their first thought was to re-erect the Tabernacle in what they hoped would be its permanent location, but that was not the case. A site undefiled by death had to be found, to be clean in the eyes of the Lord (Nu 19:16). Such a site was found near Jericho, a level uninhabited plain, and here the limits of Israel’s camp was marked out with twelve boundary monoliths they pulled out of the Jordan riverbed with the Tabernacle erected in the center. They named the place Gilgal, meaning a great circle (Js 4:19-20). It remained there for seven years, while the Israelite warriors were conquering the land.
It soon became apparent that Gilgal was not a good choice, right on the eastern boundary of the land and not at all conveniently placed for the gatherings of the tribes. A more central location was needed, somewhere in the natural center of the land. Another virgin spot, undefiled by human habitation, was found in the territory of the tribe of Ephraim in a locality which was as near to the geographical center of the land as could be wished. It was just about midway between Dan in the north and Beer-sheba in the south, Gilgal in the east and Joppa in the west. A complete circle of hills creating a plain about ten miles across in the center of which a slightly elevated area was probably the site of the sacred structure.
They named the place Shiloh, and here the entire nation gathered to see the Tabernacle erected and to make this their national place of meeting for conference and decisions (Js 18:1). It was here that the will of the Lord concerning tribal territories was sought by the casting of lots (Js 18). The tabernacle here was made semi-permanent as stone walls were erected for the tabernacle but the curtains continued to be used for the cover of the building.
Here the Tabernacle remained for 369 years until the disastrous time of Eli the High Priest in the days of Samuel. Around it grew, as the years passed by, a settlement of priests and Levites, attendant on the sanctuary, which developed at length into a sizeable town. It could have been a holy town, a place memorable for the devotion of its inhabitants to Israel’s God. Unfortunately, it speedily became the reverse. In only a few years after the death of Joshua, while Phinehas the grandson of Aaron was still High Priest, a scandalous event occurred indicating how far Israel had fallen from the high ideals of their covenant with the Lord.
The story is recounted in Judges 19-21. A certain Levite of Mount Ephraim, a few miles from Shiloh – probably one of the Levites in attendance at the Tabernacle – while passing through Gibeah of Benjamin, his concubine was raped and killed by some unruly Benjamites. The outcome was a punitive expedition against the people of Gibeah which developed into a war of revenge by all the other tribes against all Benjaminites. Phinehas went into the Tabernacle to ask the Lord if they should continue this war to the death and the Lord told him to do so and he would deliver the Benjamites into their hands. The consequence was that the war was pursued with such zeal and fury that the entire tribe of Benjamin, some fifty thousand as well as women and children were wiped out with the exception of six hundred men. With a swift reversal of sentiment, the victors then came to the Tabernacle and bemoaned to God the fact that a tribe had been lost out of Israel, and that because of a great oath they had sworn before God to the effect that none of them would ever give his daughter in marriage to a Benjamite they were precluded from doing anything to rebuild the tribe. They found one territory was not present and had not made this vow, so they killed all the men and women not virgins so the men of Benjamin could marry them, but the number was not enough (Jd 21:17‑24). To remedy that, there was to be a feast at Shiloh in which the “daughters of Shiloh” came out and danced. The men of Benjamin were to lie in wait, abduct the girls and retreat to their hometown and nothing would be done by the remaining tribes of Israel. Thus, the terms of the oath would be circumvented.
What is not made apparent in the story as it appears in Judges is the fact that these ‘daughters of Shiloh’ were the young attendants in the service of the Tabernacle, their lives consecrated to sacred service, as were Jephthah’s daughter and Samuel in much later days. The fact that the elders of Israel should recommend this act and the priests in charge sanction such as act is a measure of the extent to which, in less than a couple of generations, Israel had fallen short of its own high ideals. It seems the glory of the Tabernacle began to depart almost as soon as it was erected at Shiloh.
For more than two centuries after this, the story of the Tabernacle is virtually a blank; nothing is known of its history. This is the period of the oppression of Israel by the Moabites, the Syrians and the Philistines which of itself indicates that Israel had largely turned away from God and so earned the penalty of the violated Covenant. This is the period that the writer of Judges says, “In those days there was no king in Israel; every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Jd 17:6, 21:25). It was a time of anarchy in which a few remained faithful to Israel’s God and the rest were indifferent.
Towards the end of this period came the upheaval in the Priesthood which resulted in the line of Eleazar being deposed and priests of the line of Ithamar, Aaron’s younger son, seizing the duties of office. So when the child Samuel was brought to the Tabernacle by his mother to be devoted to Divine service, Eli of the line of Ithamar was the serving High Priest. It was here that Samuel was called by God during the time of the high priest Eli. Interestingly, Samuel slept in the room where the ark of the covenant was held. So, it seems the same restrictions that were held during the time of Moses were not strictly adhered to during this time.
Eli’s sons took advantage of their positions of authority. They were to receive part of the sacrifice as the Law stated, but they demanded raw meat before the sacrifice was made ready so it could be roasted instead of boiled as regulations required, and they would sleep with the women who served at the tabernacle.
Twenty years later came the crowning tragedy. The warriors of Israel, beaten in conflict with their hereditary enemies, the Philistines, decided to take the Ark of the Covenant into battle. Hophni and Phinehas, the sons of Eli, carried it into battle before them in the belief God would never allow it to fall into the hands of the uncircumcised, and so victory would be assured. That was not the case and the Ark fell into the hands of the Philistines and the Israelites were soundly defeated once again. Hophni and Phinehas were also killed. The High Priest Eli, when news of his sons and the Ark’s capture was brought to him, fell off his seat, broke his neck and died.
The Philistines first sent the ark to Ashdod and placed it in the temple of Dagon. The next day, they found Dagon had fallen face down before it. They righted the statue but the next day, the hands and head were detached. The people were also plagued with tumors.
Taking this as a bad omen, they sent the ark to Gath where the men of the city also developed tumors. They immediately sent the ark to Ekron but after several died or were afflicted with tumors, the people of the city rebelled and said they did not want it in their city. Apparently, there was also an infestation of rats. They put it on an ox cart and sent it toward Israel. The oxen wound up in Beth-Shemesh. The Ark was then placed in the house of Abinadab in Kirjath Jeraim. That is where it remained for almost 50 years.
Now, coming back to Shiloh, the Philistines destroyed Shiloh, but before they did so, it is probable that before the Philistines reached the spot, Samuel and those with him succeeded in dismantling the structure and transporting it out of harm’s way. With the death of Eli, Samuel remained the only person of authority in Israel and he probably assumed control. He re-erected the Tabernacle on its original site at Gilgal, without the Ark of the Covenant, and there it remained for something like fifty years into the reign of Saul. It was at Gilgal that Samuel offered the sacrifices connected with Saul’s appointment as king and at Gilgal that Saul was formally crowned king over Israel (1Sa10.8; 11.15). The High Priesthood was restored to the legal line of Eleazar in the person of Ahitub, the father of Zadok who lived during the time of David. The Day of Atonement rituals could not be performed due to the absence of the Ark, so Ahitub was merely given the courtesy title of “Ruler of the House of God” (1Ch 9:15; Ne 11:11). This was not only the end of Shiloh; it also marked a turning-point in the Lord’s dealings with Israel.
As you recall, Joseph had received the birthright from his father Jacob and passed it on to his son Ephraim (Gn 48:20). Now the tribe of Ephraim in whose territory Shiloh stood had become the leading idolatrous tribe in Israel. This supreme example of their godlessness moved the Lord to reject Ephraim and pass the birthright to Judah, as represented in his descendant David, soon then to be born. Psalm 78 records the sad circumstances of that fatal battle, the loss of the Ark and the Lord’s consequent action against the children of Ephraim, being armed and carrying bows, turned back in the day of battle. They kept not the covenant of God and refused to walk in his law…they provoked him to anger with their high places, and moved him to jealousy with their graven images. When God heard this he was angry, and greatly abhorred Israel, so that he forsook the tabernacle of Shiloh, the tent which he placed among men; and delivered his strength into captivity and his glory into the enemy’s hand … the fire consumed their young men; their priests fell by the sword … he refused the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim, but chose the tribe of Judah, the Mount Zion which he loved” (Psalm 78. 9‑70). It was at this point that Judah became the royal tribe of Israel, destined to produce Israel’s kings.
Shiloh was destroyed. The Old Testament gives no hint of what happened to the priestly settlement surrounding the Tabernacle. There can be no doubt that the Philistines, flushed with victory and capture of the Ark, soon covered the forty miles from Beth-Shemesh where the battle was fought, and carried fire and sword through the little town. It never recovered. Shiloh was erased from the face of the earth. Five hundred years later the Lord said to Israel through the prophet Jeremiah, reproving them for their apostasy, “Go ye now to my place which was in Shiloh, where I set my name at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel. And now, because ye have done all these works . . . and I called unto you, and ye answered not, therefore will I do unto this house (the Temple at Jerusalem) which I gave unto you and your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh” (Jr 7.12‑14).
Saul, when he became king, moved the tabernacle to Nob and dismissed Ahitub. He appointed Ahimelech as high priest; he was the son of another Ahitub, a grandson of Eli, who as a child had survived the massacre at Shiloh. This Ahimelech had sided with Saul in the troublous period of his early kingship and acted as a kind of personal priest to him (1Sa 14:3). This arrangement did not last long; Saul, suspecting Ahimelech of treasonable communication with David and giving him shewbread from the tabernacle for David and his men to eat, who was then on the run from Saul, sent men and massacred the entire priesthood of Nob, Abiathar son of Ahimelech alone escaping, and removed the Tabernacle to his own home town of Gibeon (1Sa 22:9‑23). This fact is known only by inference. When, later on, David became king of all Israel, the Tabernacle, complete with the altar of burnt-offering but without the Ark, was standing at Gibeon. Zadok, of the line of Eleazar, was its priest (1Ch 16:39; 21:29). This must have been done by Saul after his slaughter of the priesthood at Nob. Here it stood throughout the reign of David and until the accession of Solomon (1Ki 3:4;2Ch 1:3-15).
Somewhere about the twelfth year of David’s reign, he decided to bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem. It was at first a debacle because the ark was again on an ox cart and not carried on the priests’ shoulders as the Law dictated. It was placed in the house of Obed-Edom for 3 months. David then brought it into Jerusalem. He erected what was evidently a replica of the Tabernacle with an altar for offerings. He did not, however, interfere with the true Tabernacle, with its Brazen Altar made by Moses, at Gibeon. Thus, for another thirty years there were two Tabernacles in Israel, and two High Priests. The original Tabernacle was at Gibeon with Zadok of the legal line of Eleazar serving as High Priest, but the Levitical sacrifices could not he performed there because it did not possess the Ark of the Covenant. The new Tabernacle at Jerusalem had the Ark and a new altar of burnt offering, but the High Priest was Abiathar of the condemned line of Ithamar. At neither place could the full ceremonies demanded by the Law be carried out and it is probable that the annual Day of Atonement sacrifice had long since become obsolete.
That is where the Ark stayed until Solomon placed it in the temple he built. It seems David would go into the tent and sit before the Ark of the Covenant and talk to God: “Then King David went in and sat before the LORD, and he said . . .” (2Sa 7:18).
So ever since Hophni and Phinehas took the ark into battle, it was never back in the tabernacle.
The decommissioning of the two Tabernacles is apparently undocumented. It may have been that Solomon designed into the Temple structure extra rooms to store the Tabernacle components as religious/historic relics. It was likely within these extra rooms among these items that the Book of the Law could be misplaced and later found by Hilkiah during the reign of Josiah according to 2 Kings 22:8. Without all these items being stored within the Temple structure how could the Book of the Law possibly get misplaced?
Once the ark was back in the temple, it seems the restrictions around its access was re-established.
From this torturous journey of the Tabernacle and its Ark of the Covenant, it shows that God is still about people’s heart and not just about how one keeps the prescribed law. Obedience is important but having a heart right toward him is paramount. Typically, if the latter is correct, the former becomes correct.
We serve a wonderful, merciful God. Could we ask for more?
____________
Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens