Three examples of such a miracle are given in scripture: (1) a person who had just died only minutes before (Mt 9:18-19, 23-26; Mk 5:21-24; 35-43; Lk 8:40-42; 49-56); (2) a person who had been dead for a day or so (Jn 7:11-17); (3) a person who had been dead for over three days (Jn 11:1-57). Think about this as we go through these examples.

Jairus was a ruler in the synagogue at Capernaum. The ruler of the synagogue was the man chosen to care for the physical arrangements of the synagogue services. Today’s equivalent would be the president of the synagogue. They partner with the clergy, oversee the business operations of the synagogue, preside over the governance of the congregation, and serve as the chief financial officer and revenue generator.

This man’s daughter was likely only dead for less than an hour or so because she was sick when Jairus left to get Jesus and had just died when Jesus arrived at his house.

Surely, Jesus knew that the girl had actually died, so why did Jesus say Jairus’ daughter was only asleep? We don’t know for sure. Maybe he was indicating that weeping and mourning for someone who had hope was not necessary. Maybe he was indicating that there is no true death when the Messiah is involved, or her time of death will be so short it will be as if she had been asleep. Maybe he was mocking them for they were insincere in their crying and weeping.

It seems strange, and almost rude, that the mourners laughed at Jesus’ statement. Why did the mourners laugh? These were likely professional mourners. In rabbinic times, funeral processions were led by lamenting female mourners, often professionals. The Mishnah states that "even the poorest in Israel should hire not less than two flutes and one wailing woman" for his wife's funeral. Women also composed elegies that were chanted aloud. Prohibitions against women's voices being heard in public were relaxed for funerary rituals. Therefore, these mourners had no real invested interest in the family. This was just a job to them. Otherwise, they would have been incensed at his statement and not have resorted to laughter.

Why did Jesus tell Jairus and his family not to tell anyone what happened? Maybe he did not want his fame to spread within Israel too quickly as that would overshadow his greater message. Yet, we must realize that keeping such an act silent in such a close-knit group of people would have been nearly impossible.

Why did Jesus only have Peter, James, and John with him when he healed the girl? We don’t know for sure because Scripture doesn’t tell us. Maybe, though, he knew these three would be the leaders of the church after his ascension.

Another example was the raising of a widow’s son. This man was likely dead only a day or so because a body was typically buried as quickly as possible after death because the Jews did not embalm their dead. We don’t know of any necessary reason Jesus would have to go through Nain on his journey from Capernaum. Undoubtedly, he went there to meet this poor widow and decrease her pain. Even if that was not the case, learning she was a widow and no other male sons, this moved him to have compassion on the woman.

She had no husband and now, no son. Typically, the property would go to the next male heir in line. Therefore, she would be dependent upon more distant relatives who may have less of her interest at heart. While during this time, some women did have affluence, this was not typically true of those of agrarian societies with less Roman influence. Even if she was able to own the property, she would not be able to take care of it on her own. And if she sold it, she would have no place to stay. So it was a conundrum. It seems Jesus had a solution to her conundrum that no one would have ever thought possible. Only he could turn sorrow into profound joy.

Next is the resurrection of Lazarus, a close friend of Jesus. Why was Jesus away when his close friend died?

It seems Jesus often stayed with Lazarus, Martha, and Mary in Bethany when he came to Jerusalem because the distance between the two cities was only about two miles. He had been teaching in Jerusalem and had several disputes with the Jewish leaders. Discussion became so hot they threatened to stone him. He eventually left to go on the other side of Jordan so things could settle down somewhat. Likely, he considered two miles not far enough away for him to be confronted outside Jerusalem.

So, an important question: did Jesus let Lazarus die? Bethany beyond Jordan (also known as Bethabara) was only 15-20 miles away from the Bethany near Jerusalem where Lazarus lived with Martha and Mary, and this distance could be traveled in a day. If it took the men a day to travel and tell Jesus of Lazarus being sick, and then Jesus waiting two days, and then traveling a day to reach Bethany where Martha and Mary were, then it would mean Lazarus died shortly after the men left on their way to tell Jesus. Lazarus was likely buried on the same day of his death as the Jews did not embalm people, and this occurred in the Springtime when decay would start to settle in quickly. Jesus knew Lazarus was dead as soon as the men told him he was sick.

If Jesus knew this, why did he tarry two days before starting his trip to Bethany and arrive on the fourth day after Lazarus died? Jewish mysticism teaches that a deceased person’s spirit remains around the body for up to three days after death before departing. It was well-known in Israel 2,000 years ago that someone deceased could come back to life during this 3-day period but not afterwards.

The other two examples were within this time period. Jesus wanted to show that he was indeed the Lord of Resurrection. After the spirit left the body and even after decay had set in, he could restore one to perfect health.

How much faith did Mary and Martha have? More than some, but less than likely Jesus expected. They didn’t doubt he was the Messiah and could heal. They were just unsure why he did not do it for their brother who was so close to him. Yet, they obeyed his command even though they did not understand it. That is the definition of faith, is it not?

Again, the Jewish leaders’ hearts were only hardened against Jesus for this feat which was clear only someone from God could accomplish. What was Caiaphas, the high priest, really saying when he said the following to his fellow members of the Sanhedrin: “You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish?”

Caiaphas was a Sadducee and held the position of high priest for 18 years. Sadducees held the majority seat in the Sanhedrin, the Jewish high court, over which Caiaphas ruled while he served as high priest. In terms of theology, Sadducees denied the afterlife and any existence of the spiritual world (angels, demons, etc.). Because of these things, they were often at odds with Jesus due to His teachings about humility, heaven, and his own deity.

In addition to his role as high priest, Caiaphas came under the direct authority of the Roman governor (he served under two: Quirinus and Gratus). The governor wielded power to appoint a high priest of his choice. This is why Annas worked hard to keep the high priesthood within his family after he was removed from that position. Caiaphas was his son-in-law. The governor could also use self-serving political influence and take custody of the high priest’s sacred vestments.

Caiaphas therefore had an incentive to keep the Pax Romana, the Roman peace, and help squash any and all insurrections of any kind. He was saying they had to have Jesus killed so that Rome would not take vengeance on them or the people as a whole. Therefore, that is why they plotted to have him arrested. His words, while intending to be their plot became the prophecy of why Jesus actually came to earth so he could die and unite all unto himself.

And what of your reaction? Will you be like Martha and Mary who had enough faith to follow Jesus’ instructions even when they did not understand them only to have joy beyond their imagination, or will you be like Caiaphas who saw only a means to and end in using Christ rather than acknowledging and serving him? He’s waiting for your response. Trust me; go for the joy.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

As we mentioned in a previous post, there were three types of miracles the Jewish leaders taught that only the Messiah would be able to do: (1) cast out a mute demon, (2) heal a man born blind, and (3) heal leprosy. We have already seen how he did the first two. In this post, we’ll see how he did the third.

The healing and cleansing from leprosy is found in three of the gospels: Matthew chapter 8, verses 1-4; Mark chapter 1, verses 40-45, and Luke chapter 5, verses 12-16. In these passages, Jesus encounters a man with leprosy who asked Jesus to heal him. Jesus does and tells the man to go to the priest so he could be pronounced clean and then enter back into society.

Then, Luke records another encounter for us in chapter 17, verses 11-19. Here there are ten lepers. They do not approach Jesus, but yell to him from a distance asking for healing. They head to the priest and are healed along the way. One of them returns and falls at Jesus’ feet praising and thanking him.

What about the healing of leprosy was considered so profound? In the Torah, it appears that God alone inflicts leprosy on a person:

“Then the LORD said, ‘Put your hand inside your cloak.’ So Moses put his hand into his cloak, and when he took it out, the skin was leprous—it had become as white as snow” (Ex 4:6).

“The LORD replied to Moses, ‘If her father had spit in her face, would she not have been in disgrace for seven days? Confine her outside the camp for seven days; after that she can be brought back.’ So Miriam was confined outside the camp for seven days, and the people did not move on till she was brought back” (Nu 12:14-15).

“They confronted King Uzziah and said, ‘It is not right for you, Uzziah, to burn incense to the LORD. That is for the priests, the descendants of Aaron, who have been consecrated to burn incense. Leave the sanctuary, for you have been unfaithful; and you will not be honored by the LORD God.’ Uzziah, who had a censer in his hand ready to burn incense, became angry. While he was raging at the priests in their presence before the incense altar in the LORD’s temple, leprosy broke out on his forehead. When Azariah the chief priest and all the other priests looked at him, they saw that he had leprosy on his forehead, so they hurried him out. Indeed, he himself was eager to leave, because the LORD had afflicted him. King Uzziah had leprosy until the day he died. He lived in a separate house—leprous, and banned from the temple of the LORD. Jotham his son had charge of the palace and governed the people of the land” (2Ch 28:18-21).

And in the Tanakh, it stated that no person had ever healed an Israelite from leprosy; only God himself had sone so. Because of this, the priest to whom these men presented themselves must have been taken aback to hear their stories of healing by Jesus as it was his belief that only God could heal leprosy. Unfortunately, we don’t have a record of his reaction.

Jesus was the only person who would touch an unclean person and not be afraid of becoming defiled himself. Why? One reason could be because of what the Law said about the sin offering.

“Whatever touches any of the flesh [of the sin offering] will become holy, and if any of the blood is spattered on a garment, you must wash it in the sanctuary area.” (Lv 6:27).

Did you catch that? As far as I know, this is the only thing that makes something else holy. Normally, the Law stated that anything unclean would make something it touches unclean. Here, it is just the opposite. That is why they had to be so careful about handling the sin offering. As Jesus was our sin offering, it seems what he touched became clean. In this instance, the leprosy (being an uncleanness of the skin) became whole (cleanness of skin). I find that remarkable.

There are some translations which state Jesus was “indignant”? The NIV is one of the few who translates the word to “indignant” rather than “having compassion.” There has been much debate about this. However, Jesus did have compassion or else he would not have healed. Yet, it may be that he could have become indignant because the man said, “if you will” which implied doubt on the man’s part that Jesus was willing. Jesus responded that of course he was willing and healed the man from his leprosy. If he was indignant, this did not mean he was not also compassionate. Otherwise, the man would not have been healed.

Leprosy was a very devastating disease. It wasn’t just the physical part where a person’s skin literally came off a person. It was that no one would touch a leper. Can you image going for years and years without any human contact or touch. For Jesus to touch him when he was a leper was probably more moving than we can ever imagine.

Why did Jesus give the healed leper a strong warning not to tell anyone except the priest? There are perhaps three important reasons to consider:

1)           Publicity over his healing might hinder Christ’s mission and divert public attention from his message to them. Such publicity is what, at times, forced Jesus away from the more populated areas.

2)           It was important that the priest pronounce the man to have obtained a genuine cure so that there might be no prejudice among the Jews against its being a real miracle. Possibly, if the man did not go at once to the priest without delay, evil-minded men might prejudice the priest and prevent his declaring the healing to be true because it was done by Jesus.

3)           Jesus did not want people focusing on the miracles themselves, but rather on the message he was proclaiming and the death he was going to die.

Why did the one leper come back to Jesus and the others did not? There are likely several reasons, but for this man who was a Samaritan, he had no priest to go to in order to show he was healed. The only place to go to have recognition of his cleansing was the one who had performed the cleansing. It is likely the others were Jewish and would go to the temple to receive their cleansing and be allowed back into society.

This does not excuse them from not returning to be thankful but could be one explanation for why this one man returned: not only because he was thankful, but he had no other person to present himself to for recognition of his cleansing.

So, we have seen Jesus perform three miracles that Jewish tradition stated that only their coming Messiah would be able to do. Yet, the Jewish leaders still did not believe him to be the Messiah. Why? Perhaps we should reverse that question and ask why do we not believe when we have this same level of evidence?

Ponder that and see if you can come to the same realization of who Jesus really is that his man did. What did he do? He threw himself at Jesus’ feet and thanked him. Jesus is waiting for this moment from you so he can wrap you in his arms just as you are. He is the sin offering. His touch will cleanse you. Are you ready?

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle is found in the gospel of John chapter 9, verses 1-41. Jesus and his disciples come across a man who had been blind since birth. His disciples are curious to know if this man or his parents had sinned causing this man to be born this way. Jesus said the answer was neither. This surprised the disciples because they had always been taught that such an incurable infirmity must be due to sin. They had often heard their Jewish leaders say, “there is no death without sin and there is no suffering without iniquity.” Some teachers of the law taught that Scripture taught this. For the parents to be at fault, some Jewish leaders pointed to Exodus 20:5 (for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me) and Ezekiel 18:20 (the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them). Yet, these phrases seem to be taken somewhat out of context to support this tenant. Regarding the unborn having sin, some rabbis thought it possible, while others thought it impossible. It’s not clear how widely held the prenatal sin view was, but apparently it was widely held enough to generate debate among themselves. Some argued that when it was stated about Jacob and Esau that they “struggled together” in the womb (Gn 25:33), it was implying they were trying to kill each other. Again, this seems to be an over interpretation of what the scripture is actually implying. So, it seems the disciples were wanting to understand from Jesus what the true answer to this debate was as they knew Jesus, of all people, would know the answer.

Instead, Jesus said this man was born this way so God could be magnified. Jesus made some mud using his own saliva, placed it on the man’s eyes, and then told him to go and wash his eyes in the pool of Siloam (in the southern part of the city of Jerusalem). The man did so and received his sight.

Jesus also made somewhat of a strange statement: night is coming when no one can work. What did he mean by this? The disciples were learning that they needed to make the most of their opportunities while they had the Light of the World (i.e., Jesus) with them. They needed to pay attention to him, to learn from him, so they could know him and faithfully represent him later. Today, we can’t “work while it is day” in the same way because Jesus is not personally here on earth. Yet, we still have been enlightened by him—he is the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6). Like the disciples, we should look to him, and like the disciples were encouraged to do—and like Jesus did—we should also make the most of the opportunities afforded to us. Each opportunity is provided by God for his glory, so we need to consider how we can work while it is still day.

Why did Jesus make mud with his saliva? There was a belief that saliva had healing properties. Maybe Jesus was indicating that healing was in progress to the people around him. Or it may be because the act of creating mud was considered work by the Jewish leaders. Perhaps Jesus is again emphasizing that the Sabbath was created for man and not man for the Sabbath (Mk 2:27). Doing good is always appropriate for the Sabbath. If the Law allowed them to get a donkey out of the ditch on the Sabbath (Dt 22:4), why not their fellow man who is far more valuable?

Why did Jesus send the man to the Siloam pool? In some respects, it was a word play, for the word Siloam meant “sent” (Jn 9:7). Christ had been sent by God through his authority, and now Christ was sending this man in his authority.

This was the last great day of the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot). The previous seven days, the priests each morning went from the temple to the Pool of Siloam in the southern part of the City of David and gathered water in a golden vessel and brought it to the altar through the Water Gate in the Southern side of the Temple. The water was then poured down the side of the altar to signify the outpouring of the Holy Spirit.

On this last day, the ceremony was not done. Yet, Jesus is now sending the blind man to the pool. Rather than the Holy Spirit being brought to the temple, the man is sent to the Holy Spirit for his healing.

Christ had just stated he is working while he is here on Earth. Who would be working when he is gone? The Holy Spirit. Perhaps this was a lesson for the disciples to ponder once he was gone from them.

Jesus did not go with the man to the pool. Who took him? We don’t really know. Maybe he knew his way around, but that’s traveling about a fifth of a mile. Also, Jesus was not there when the man received his sight. The miracle of sight would be its own witness for the man to proclaim to the people.

Why did the people not believe this was the man who had been blind and begged? Those who knew this man knew he had been born blind. They had been taught that one born blind could not be cured. Such a one was in sin and God would not heal such a man steeped in sin before he was even born. This is also why the Pharisees and Jewish leaders grilled him and his parents so. They also could not rectify that one born blind could now see. Rather than rejoicing in the miracle, they did all they could to deny the miracle.

They questioned the man relentlessly but did not believe him. They then questioned his parents and then brought the man back again. Not to understand, but how to discredit. They still tried to make the man feel like a sinner rather than rejoice with him. They said that the man who healed him was a sinner as well. The man quotes back to them scripture that they should know and reveals what they said about Jesus was untrue: “The Lord is far from the wicked, but He hears the prayer of the righteous” (Pr 15:29). This makes the Jewish leaders mad, and they tell this man that someone steeped in sin from birth has no right to tell the righteous (indicating themselves) they are wrong. They then forcibly excommunicate the man from the temple.

Jesus then meets the man a second time. This miracle affected this man deeply and he was willing to stand up to the Jewish leaders and point out their hypocrisy. He was ready for a true encounter with the Messiah. Jesus reveals himself and the man readily accepts him and worships him. Jesus does not stop him from doing so.

What did Jesus mean when he said, “For judgment I have come into this world, so that the blind will see and those who see will become blind?” The reference to those who see versus those who are blind is meant to explain this entire incident with the blind beggar and the religious critics. Those who admit their need, and trust in God, are those who will be granted sight—just as the blind man was given both sight and knowledge by Jesus in response to his sincere faith. Those who are arrogant and presume they already know, will be hardened by the presence of Jesus, instead. Despite their knowledge (“You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, yet you refused to come to me to have life” (Jn 5:39-40)), they allow their own prejudice to blind them (“The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2Co 4:4)), making them incapable of understanding what they don't want to understand, anyway (“Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own” (Jn 7:17).).

Jesus' statement here underscores an important principle: God holds people accountable not only for what they know but holds them absolutely accountable for it. Those who come to God in humility, admitting weakness and seeking truth, are met with grace and forgiveness. We see this in this man’s response to his encounter with Jesus:

When Jesus heard that the Jewish leaders had thrown the man out of the temple (i.e., excommunicated him), he found him, and said to him, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?” “Who is he, sir?” the man asked. “Tell me so that I may believe in him.” Jesus said, “You have now seen him; in fact, he is the one speaking with you.” Then the man said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped him (Jn 9:35-38).

This is a good example of the fulfillment of Matthew 7:7–8 – “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.”

Those who think they are wise, who claim to have spiritual sight, will be judged accordingly (“Not many of you should become teachers, my fellow believers, because you know that we who teach will be judged more strictly” (Ja 3:1)). This is especially true of those who, like the Pharisees, have knowledge and deliberately choose to ignore it.

Yet, can we today be too quick to judge here? Do we not at times act hypocritical? I think this is a good example for us to really look at our actions and see how they really align with Scripture. “If anyone, then, knows the good they ought to do and doesn’t do it, it is sin for them” (Ja 4:17). Truth is necessary even when it is sometimes hard to hear.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle is found in the gospel of Mark chapter 1, verses 21-28, and in the gospel of Luke chapter 4, verses 31-37. Jesus went into the synagogue at Capernaum one Sabbath. A man who was possessed with a demon cried out loudly asking Jesus what he was doing there. Jesus commanded the demon to come out of the man and the demon had to obey. Everyone there were amazed, and Jesus’ notoriety increased greatly.

In the first century, synagogues were run by a chief ruler. This person would often open the service with various recitations, he would have a priest or Levite read a portion of the Torah, a portion from the prophets would be read in Hebrew and interpreted for the common people in attendance, and a sermon was then provided by someone. This was typically by the chief ruler but could also be a visiting rabbi or teacher. It seems Jesus often spoke at a synagogue as the chief rulers would allow him to do so since his fame was spreading throughout the land of Israel.

The word “synagogue” was formed from a combination of two Greek words (“ago” meaning to lead or bring along, and the preposition “sun” meaning together) and came to mean “to gather in, collect, or assemble.” The word synagogue in its earliest usages did not refer to a physical location or a physical building. First, Jewish individuals assembled and then once they began to build structures for their meetings, the word synagogue came to be applied to the building itself.

There were several activities these synagogues provided for their congregation. Activities included the reading and instruction of the law, the Torah, as well as providing hostel services such as lodging, food, and water for strangers.

Scripture indicates Jesus often healed people while he visited synagogues. The controversy of his work there wasn’t about his healing but about him doing so on the Sabbath. Healing on the Sabbath was a sacrilege according to some (Jn 15:1-18). There is one instance when the ruler of the synagogue angrily told the people to return to the synagogue on a day other than the Sabbath to be healed (Lk 13:14).

The same help the synagogue gave to its congregation and to those who were sick or needed help was also provided by the temple in Jerusalem. The temple of Jerusalem and the synagogues scattered throughout the land of Israel both seem to have attracted the needy in their respective communities. This may suggest why the Gospel writers often locate Jesus healing at a synagogue when he was not in Jerusalem, but when he was in Jerusalem, he healed at or near the temple instead of the synagogue. It seems appropriate contextually that Jesus first proclaims his mission to the needy at the synagogue and performs many of his acts of compassions on behalf of the needy at the synagogue — the ancient Jewish community center. He proclaimed at the synagogue in Nazareth, his hometown, the following: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he has sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight for the blind, to set the oppressed free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.” Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him. He began by saying to them, “Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing” (Lk 4:18-21).

So, the synagogues were built as a geographical and symbolic extension of the Jerusalem temple. It allowed Jewish leaders to meet the Jewish people in their own communities more often than when the people visited the Jerusalem temple.

Many people, when they heard Jesus speak, would say he spoke with authority. Why was that? The scribes and Pharisees would quote from various authoritative Jewish scholars when they taught to drive home a point or an interpretation of scripture, like a textbook where references are provided to show that there are other authoritative sources saying the same thing as you or that supports your premise or conclusion. In the Old Testament, prophets had authority because they spoke, “Thus says the Lord.” Jesus spoke from his own authority and would say, “Verily I say unto you.”

Why did Jesus shut the demoniac down so quickly? Jesus did not give dignity to the demon by carrying on a conversation with it or allow it to manifest its nature further. Jesus rebuked the demon almost immediately, commanding it to be silent and to come out of the man. The demon obeyed, but only after one final rebellious act. The demon cast the man to the ground in a way that was so violent, it seemed certain the man would have been seriously injured. Yet in Luke’s account of this, he lets us know that no injury came to the man from this display. Jesus, not the demon, was in total control.

During this time in first century Judaism, exorcisms were not uncommon, but were typically a long, drawn-out process with formulas and protocols to follow, like first getting to know the name of the demon they were dealing with. It was believed that if they knew the name of the demon, the one performing the exorcism could use that name against the demon making it reveal something they could then use to force the demon out of the person. This was one reason the process was so lengthy as often the demon knew their tactics and did not want to relinquish their name to the one trying to exorcise them from the person they inhabited. The one doing the exorcism knew when they were successful when they noticed a quick, definite, and dramatic change in the person’s persona or speech.

Jesus did not do his exorcism in this manner. He cast out the demon in just one short sentence: “Come out of him!”

The brevity of the incident had a profound impact on those who watched. At the word of Jesus, demons obeyed. This demonstrated to the people there that Jesus had great power and authority.

There is another incident of this type where a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute was brought to Jesus for healing (Mt 12:22-23; Jn 11:14-20). This time, the people asked if Jesus was the Messiah after this miracle of healing but not after the miracle he performed in Capernaum. Why? Normally, a person who was mute all their lives would have to learn how to talk. That was not the case here. The man could talk coherently immediately.

This passage in John lets us know that it was the demon who was preventing the man from speaking. It was this kind of demon against which Judaism's methodology was powerless because he could not speak, so there was no way of establishing communication with this kind of a demon; no way of finding out this demon's name. Likely, this demon was using this thought of a mute demon being beyond help to stay in this man. So, within the framework of Judaism, it was impossible to cast out a dumb demon.

The rabbis taught, however, that when the Messiah came, he would be able to cast out this type of demon. As this was one of the messianic miracles that would prove who the Messiah really was, the audience turned to the leaders and asked them, “Is this him?” In other words, they were asking if Jesus was the long-awaited Jewish Messiah. After all, Jesus was doing the very things they had been taught from childhood that only the Messiah would be able to do. They never asked this question when Jesus casts out other types of demons. However, when he casts out a dumb demon, they raised the question because they recognized from the teachings of the rabbis that this was a messianic miracle.

There were two other messianic miracles that the Jewish leaders taught that the coming Messiah would be able to perform. One was the healing from leprosy. They taught that only the Messiah would be able to heal a Jewish leper. The other miracle was healing someone born blind. Healing someone who had gone blind was one thing since it was a matter of restoring what was lost. Yet, one born blind had no history to go back to when that person could see. In the posts to come, we’ll address how Jesus also fulfilled these types of miracles as well.

As you can see, Jesus Christ was more than a miracle worker. He went beyond expectation to remove any doubt of his authority and his purpose. Yet, as you can see, the Jewish leaders still did not believe. What about you? Do you still doubt even though you have read all he has done for you? More evidence is not what will make you believe. Yielding your will to him and believing him by faith will. Take the step. You’ll be so glad you did.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle is found in the gospel of Luke in chapter 5, verses 1-11. Jesus was speaking to a group of people on the seashore near where Peter and his friends were returning from an all-night toil of trying to catch fish, but they had no success and were returning with no fish whatsoever. Jesus asked Peter if he could take him out a little from the shore so he could speak to the people. He later asked Peter to cast his net for a catch of fish. Peter reluctantly does so, and the number of fish he caught in his nets was so great, the boat nearly sank. This led to Peter recognizing that Jesus was, indeed, the Messiah for whom the Jews had been waiting.

Gennesaret is a small plain bordering the west shore of the Sea of Galilee between Capernaum and Magdala. The plain is about four miles long, running north and south along the seacoast, and up to about two miles wide. The name is also a small town in the area bearing the name Gennesaret. Some sources read “Gennesar.” Therefore, the sea was called by some Sea of Gennesaret rather than Sea of Galilee. The land here is level, rising gently from the level of the Sea of Galilee, which is 650 ft. below the Mediterranean Sea. Hills rise sharply on three sides. The main road from Capernaum to Tiberias runs through this area close to the seashore.

During the time of Christ, this plain was the garden spot of Palestine. The historian Josephus described this area as being beautiful and fertile with a climate ranging from hot to temperate. There were also several streams in this area providing plenty of water for irrigation. There was an abundance of wild trees and flowers, as well as important crops such as grapes, figs, olives, walnuts, rice, wheat, vegetables, and melons. The rabbis often spoke of this plain as “the Garden of God” and a “paradise.”

For Jesus to address large crowds and they hear him, it would suggest that Jesus was below the crowds and the crowds sat along the slope of the hillside. This is also why he often spoke from a boat slightly offshore. Sound waves are reflected off the surface of the water toward the shore because the sound waves are bent down back into the surface of the water and then reflected so the sound wave travels even farther. The sound waves hit the warm air above the lake, the upper part of the sound waves travels faster than the lower part, and so the wave gets bent downward back onto the surface of the water where it's then reflected back into the air--and the process repeats. When the sound waves arrive at the shore, the air at ground level is now warm (and the air above the ground is cooler). This makes the sound waves bend upward--up the hill. Thus, all the people seated or standing on the hillside can clearly hear what Jesus is saying. In addition, this area where Jesus spoke to them was away from the sounds of the nearby towns.

What was the purpose of this miracle? First, it seems likely Jesus knew Simon Peter would be there, so he picked this place not only for the better acoustics but for a specific person as well. Going into the boat also allowed Jesus to not be so pressed by the crowds and allowed him to use the water to help amplify his words for the people to hear better. Jesus also likely knew it would take something monumental to get Peter’s attention. It seems Peter tried to be polite, but he was also tired, so obeying Jesus’ request was irritating to him as he felt Jesus knew nothing about fishing whereas fishing was his specialty. He had toiled all night fishing with zero results. In Peter’s mind, he was likely asking himself what could Jesus possibly contribute to his fishing expertise?

It seems Peter and Andrew were in some type of alliance with Zebedee and his sons James and John. This allowed them to share resources as well as profits and even their debts. Jesus knew this and used this fact to get not only Peter’s attention but that of James and John as well.

While Peter obeyed Jesus’ request, he did not obey with much enthusiasm. Yet, Peter’s obedience brought in a surprise catch—more than Peter could have ever imagined. There were so many fish in their nets that both the boat of Peter and Andrew as well as the boat of James and John could barely contain the quantity of fish without sinking. This definitely got Peter’s attention and broke down his stone exterior and began to reach his heart. The amount of money this catch brought them likely was enough to sustain them for quite some time and allowed Peter, Andrew, James, and John to follow Jesus without adding undue hardship to their families.

This story is a bookend to the beginning and the end of Jesus’ ministry and to the relationship between Jesus and Peter. We see something similar in John chapter 21, verses 2-15. Peter’s ministry with Jesus started with a net full of fish and Jesus encouraged Peter again after his resurrection to let Peter know his ministry will and should continue. In both instances, the number of fish was indicative of something extraordinary happening. While the nets began to break this first time, the net held the second time, perhaps signaling Jesus was strong enough to care for them as the disciples continued to move forward. Also, this second time, Jesus had bread and fish already cooked for them. This likely caused the disciples to think about the times Jesus fed the multitudes and let them know Jesus could still sustain them and multiply their efforts.

I think Peter was somewhat like Paul in personality and Jesus knew something dramatic was needed to get his attention. Yet, once he had his attention, he was most loyal.

Jesus also knows what makes us tick and creates circumstances to get our attention to let us know he is there for us. Are you looking for these circumstances? Do so, and you will see how great our Lord is to provide for us, sustain us, and multiply our humble efforts. We serve such a great God!

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

This miracle of Jesus is found in the gospel of John Chapter 4, verses 43-54. Those in Galilee were excited to see Jesus because of what he had done in Jerusalem. What did Jesus do in Jerusalem when he went there for Passover? Let’s follow the progress of the events:

1.                  After leaving Cana, Jesus, his family, and his disciples went to Capernaum and stayed a few days (Jn 2:12).

2.                  Near Passover, Jesus went to Jerusalem (Jn 2:13).

3.                  He made a whip of cords, drove out of the temple sheep and oxen, poured out the changers’ money, overthrew their tables, and told those who sold doves to remove them from the premises saying, “Don’t make my Father’s house a marketplace!” (Jn 2:14-16).

4.                  The Jews asked by what sign he could give to show his authority to do this. Jesus said, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days” (Jn 2:18-19). They did not understand him (Jn 2:20-22).

5.                  At the Passover Festival, he did many signs (Jn 2:23). We don’t know what he did, but he did not entrust himself to them because they were only interested in what he could do and not who he was (Jn 2:24-25).

6.                  Jesus met with Nicodemus (Jn 3:1-21).

7.                  Jesus and his disciples went into the Judean countryside, spent time with his disciples, and baptized (Jn 3:22).

8.                  Some went to John where he was baptizing north of there, and he was happy to hear what Jesus was doing (Jn 3:23-36).

9.                  Jesus heads back to Galilee because the Pharisees had gained an interest in what he was doing compared to what John had done regarding baptizing (Jn 4:1).

10.              Jesus goes through Samaria and meets the woman at the well in Sychar. He stayed there for two days, and many Samaritans believed on Christ without ever having observed a miracle from Jesus (Jn 4:2-42).

11.              He then left to go back to Galilee (Jn 4:43).

The person that meets Jesus with his request is a royal official. The name used for him was basilekos, meaning a nobleman, likely of Herod’s court. This person could have been Jewish or Gentile, yet Jesus’ response to him is what he had said to other Jews. Jesus rebukes him saying, “Unless you see signs and wonders, you will in no way believe.” He had just come from the Samaritans who had believed without a miracle. The nobleman was insistent in his request, so Jesus told him to go home because his son lived. This showed the power of Christ’s divine word. He did not need to be present for the healing to take place.

As the nobleman went back toward Capernaum, he found those who had come from his home looking for him because they had news that his son was indeed well. The man discovered his son recovered the very same moment Christ had told him his son was well. The distance from where this man met Jesus to his home was about 16.5 miles—more than a day’s journey. Some have said he was so confident in Jesus’ words that he waited a day to head home. But I don’t think so. He would have been anxious to get back home no matter his belief in Jesus’ words. The distance proves it would take him more than a day for his journey home. Because of the miracle of the nobleman’s son’s healing, the whole household believed in Christ.

It is interesting to note that this time, Jesus did not say not to tell anyone. It could be because Jesus had just returned from Jerusalem and from the temple; his waiting to introduce his purpose to the Jewish leaders was now past.

There are two types of miracles: signs and wonders. Often, a true miracle from God is purposeful, and not an unexplained matter of chance or coincidence.

A sign is a divine intervention to show Divine authority. Water to wine is a sign because of the symbolism that goes with it.

A wonder is something which causes people to marvel, be astounded or even terrified. A wonder is a special manifestation of God's power. The plagues in Egypt are examples of wonders as these had no symbolism except to prove God’s authority and that He is greater than any Egyptian god.

Why did John say this was the second sign (Jn 4:54)? He said it was the second sign in Galilee. As we read earlier, Christ did many signs in Jerusalem. We don’t know what they were, but these signs got the people excited but not necessarily caused them to believe in Jesus as who he said he was.

One of signs of the past which Jesus referred to when he spoke to Nicodemus was the bronze serpent which God had commanded Moses to build and place for the people to look at so they could be healed from the serpents’ deadly bites (Nu 21:9).

Why did Jesus refer to this passage from the past? He told Nicodemus, “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes may have eternal life in him” (Jn 3:14-15). Bronze was used to represent sin and judgment (the reason the altar in front of the tabernacle and temple was made of bronze). The serpent represented the serpents who plagued the Israelites because of their sin. By looking to the bronze serpent, they were symbolically transferring their sin to the serpent on the pole and believing that God would heal them. They were relying upon God for their physical salvation which was also a symbol of their spiritual salvation.

Jesus became that for us. Our sin was transferred to him on the cross. Our belief in what he did for us brings us our spiritual salvation. In Hezekiah’s day (770 years after Moses raised the bronze serpent in the wilderness), the bronze serpent was still around and revered. Yet, people had started worshipping the bronze serpent rather than worship God. They missed the point of the message he had provided them. Are we not doing the same today? We worship the sin rather than the one who can remove the sin for us.

Hezekiah called the bronze serpent Nehushtan – meaning “a thing of bronze” (2Ki 18:4). He reduced it to its literal meaning so that people could see that it was nothing to worship. It was just a piece of brass. The people should worship the one who had the power this bronze serpent was representing. To show their foolishness, Hezekiah broke it into pieces. This did two things: (1) the people could no longer worship it; and (2) this demonstrated that this image had no imbued power. It could have been a great memorial and topical lesson for people, but they revered it rather than the one to whom it was pointing toward. Perhaps this is also symbolic of Christ’s body being broken for us.

This miracle of Jesus also helps us know that distance is not something we need to be concerned with either. Jesus can be just as personable to us as he was then. We may not see him, but he can still do great things for us. Just like this nobleman, it only requires faith. He had the faith to believe in Jesus and what he could do. How about you? You do have that kind of faith? I hope so. It will take you into a relationship you’ve always hoped for. Look to the one who was lifted up for you to bear your sin and pay the sin debt required. No one else could have done that. How will you respond?

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens

We find this very first recorded miracle of Jesus in John Chapter 2, verses 1-12. Just six days prior, John the Baptist sees Jesus and declares him, “the Lamb of God” (Jn 1:20). He also sees the Spirit of God descend upon Jesus in the form of a dove (Jn 1:32). The day after he baptizes Jesus, John again declares Jesus “the Lamb of God” and two of his disciples start to follow Jesus (Jn 1:37). Andrew was one of them and he brought his brother, Peter, to meet Jesus (Jn 1:41). The next day, Jesus leaves for Galilee and calls Philip to be a disciple. Philip gets Nathanael (whose hometown is Cana) and brings him to Jesus (Jn 1:43, 45). It is a three-day journey to Cana from where Jesus was baptized (the Jordan River near the Dead Sea).

While everyone is enjoying the festivities of the wedding, Mary, Jesus’ mother, comes to him with a major issue: the wine had run out! Why was this such as issue? Well, wedding feasts were typically a week-long affair. Hospitality was considered obligatory in this day and age of Jewish culture. To not be hospitable would be a strong insult to one’s guests.

It is believed this wedding is of someone related to Mary. Running out of wine would be an insult to their whole family and not just the mother and father of the bride. Therefore, Mary is asking Jesus to save the family an embarrassing situation. At first Jesus is hesitant, but his mother simply tells the servants to do whatever Jesus asks of them.

Jesus notices six stone jars nearby. These were not just ordinary stone jars, but jars used for ritual purification (Jn 2:6). Not just anyone would have such jars at their home. Therefore, it may be that this was a house of a priest. Cana was one of the cities where priests lived and then moved to Jerusalem when it was their time to serve as a priest at the temple in Jerusalem.

What was special about using these particular jars? Water in a stone jar would still be considered “living water.” Jewish law stated that water from a spring or from a cistern for collecting water is considered clean (Lv 11:36).

To go from water in stone jars of purification to wine in stone jars of purification was symbolic of how purification will be transferred from their current ritual purity laws to the blood of Jesus Christ which would purify going forward.

The wine was the best the master of the banquet had ever tasted (Jn 2:9-10). Jesus’ blood is also the best among bloods because only his can purify one from sin. Also, this points to the future wedding supper of the Lamb where all who have been redeemed by Him will be in attendance (Rv 19:9).

As stated, it is thought that this wedding may be of a relative of Mary’s. It would be consistent with this being a priestly family as it is believed that Mary’s mother was a descendant of Levi (the tribe from which the Jewish priests descended). We know that Mary’s aunt married a Levite and had Elizabeth who married Zechariah, a priest (Lk 1:5-7). Their son was John who became John the Baptist.

Some say that Joseph of Arimathea was Mary’s uncle. A couple of things may support this to some degree:

1.           Someone had to be with Jesus for three days at the temple when he was twelve. This could have been Joseph of Arimathea.

2.           The people didn’t seem to know Jesus when he was back in Nazareth, his hometown (Mt 13:55-56). This could be because he had been away with Joseph until he started his ministry.

There were over 7000 priests at the time of Christ. They could trace their lineage back to Aaron, the first High Priest. Only the priests could participate in making sacrifices at the temple. Most lived outside Jerusalem in towns and villages. They were divided into 24 priestly clans (1Ch 24:4; 2Ch 8:14) and would serve one week out of the year: light altar fires, attend to the offerings of incense and unleavened bread, and participate in the killing of the sacrificial animals.

There were over 9000 Levites at the time of Christ. They could trace their lineage back to Levi, the father of Moses and Aaron. These were not the same as the priests and were not from the lineage of Aaron himself. They were also comprised of 24 priestly clans and would serve one week of the year: guards, policemen, doorkeepers, singers, musicians, and servants of the temple. They were forbidden by act of death to enter the holy sanctuary or touch the altar of sacrifice.

The daily temple duties required about 1,000 chief priests, priests, and Levites. On feast days, all 24 courses were required to be in Jerusalem and perform duties at the temple. This meant that on Pesach (Passover), Shavuot (Pentecost), and Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles), there were approximately 18,000 temple personnel on duty at the temple.

While this was the first miracle we know of that Jesus performed, and a significant one, not too many knew about the miracle. Who did know? Mary, Jesus’ disciples, servants at the wedding, and the mother and father of the bride. It is unknown if they told others or kept this to themselves.

It seems, especially in the early part of Jesus’ ministry, Jesus was controlling how quickly his fame would get rolled out to the general public and thereby to the religious leaders. This particular miracle, I’m sure, sealed the faith of his disciples to him.

Jesus did have half-brothers and sisters (Mt 13:55-56). We know his brothers were also at the wedding (Jn 2:12) and then accompanied him to Capernaum where they stayed for a few days. We don’t know if they were told about this particular miracle, because it seems they did not accept Jesus as the Messiah (Jn 7:5) until after his death and resurrection (1Co 15:7). We do know they eventually did as Jesus’ half-brother James became a leader of the church in Jerusalem (Ac 15:13) and wrote the book of James, and another one of his half-brothers, Jude, wrote the book of the same name. This helps us to see that Jesus is patient with us to recognize who he really is, but then empowers us once we turn to him to be effective for him.

We understand this miracle to be his first miracle, but it is quite powerful even though it did not involve other humans. It shows how he can transform something inorganic (like water) into something organic (like wine), how something put into the jars new (water was drawn and placed in the jars) could come out aged (as this was some of the best wine the feast master had ever tasted—and he had tasted a lot of wine!), and at the same time represented how his blood would become the purification for us all. Quite the miracle, isn’t it! And he can do the same for us. Have you let him? If not, he is patiently waiting, just as he did for his brothers. You, too, can be part of his family. A simple step of faith can change everything.

____________

Visit Books & Words to Inspire by Randy C. Dockens